Using genetic algorithm in dynamic model of speculative attack
Evolution of speculative attack models show certain progress in developing idea of the role of expectations in the crisis mechanism. Obstfeld (1996) defined expectations as fully exogenous. Morris and Shin (1998) endogenised the expectations with respect to noise leaving information significance...
Saved in:
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Trường Đại học Kinh tế
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/97688 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Vietnam National University, Hanoi |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Evolution of speculative attack models show certain progress in
developing idea of the role of expectations in the crisis mechanism. Obstfeld
(1996) defined expectations as fully exogenous. Morris and Shin (1998)
endogenised the expectations with respect to noise leaving information
significance away. Dynamic approach proposed by Angeletos, Hellwig and Pavan
(2006) operates under more sophisticated assumption about learning process that
tries to reflect time-variant and complex nature of information in the currency
market much better. But this model ignores many important details like a Central
Bank cost function. Genetic algorithm allows to avoid problems connected with
incorporating information and expectations into agent decision making process to
an extent. There are some similarities between the evolution in Nature and
currency market performance. In our paper an assumption about rational agent
behaviour in the efficient market is criticised and we present our version of the
dynamic model of a speculative attack, in which we use a genetic algorithm to
define decision-making process of the currency market agents. The results of our
simulation seem to be in line with the theory and intuition. An advantage of our
model is that it reflects reality in quite complex way, i.e. level of noise changes in
time (decreasing), there are different states of fundamentals (with “more sensitive”
upper part of the scale), number of inflowing agents can be low or high (due to
different globalization phases, different capital flow phases, different uncertainty
levels). |
---|