Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice

Thailand introduced state subsidies for political parties for the first time in 1997. The Political Parties Development Fund (PPDF) was intended to reinforce the internal coherence of parties and encourage their democratic functions. Designers hoped that this party financing would be an effective me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sirivunnabood, Punchada
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol17/iss3/2
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1134/viewcontent/RA1_Sirivunnabood_20030818.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-1134
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-11342024-06-04T01:06:03Z Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice Sirivunnabood, Punchada Thailand introduced state subsidies for political parties for the first time in 1997. The Political Parties Development Fund (PPDF) was intended to reinforce the internal coherence of parties and encourage their democratic functions. Designers hoped that this party financing would be an effective means of curbing illicit fundraising, particularly during electoral campaigns. However, the PPDF has not led to strong party organizations. While the state provides a great amount of financial support for political parties every year, many parties receiving funding are still weak and unable to compete effectively in elections. Utilizing data from focus groups and extensive interviews with politicians, election commission officers, and party members, I demonstrate that financial deficiencies and a weak system of public finance allocation encouraged many small political parties—particularly those without parliamentary representation—to access these new state resources. Instead of helping to sustain the development of small and medium-sized-parties, the PPDF became an alternative source of income for those parties. Parties have intensified their efforts to exploit such funding using questionable means. Consequently, public party financing has contributed to an increase in corrupt practices in Thai party politics rather than strengthening party organizations as well as the party system. 2018-03-30T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol17/iss3/2 info:doi/10.59588/2350-8329.1134 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1134/viewcontent/RA1_Sirivunnabood_20030818.pdf Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Animo Repository political parties political party finance corruption party law Thailand
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic political parties
political party finance
corruption
party law
Thailand
spellingShingle political parties
political party finance
corruption
party law
Thailand
Sirivunnabood, Punchada
Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
description Thailand introduced state subsidies for political parties for the first time in 1997. The Political Parties Development Fund (PPDF) was intended to reinforce the internal coherence of parties and encourage their democratic functions. Designers hoped that this party financing would be an effective means of curbing illicit fundraising, particularly during electoral campaigns. However, the PPDF has not led to strong party organizations. While the state provides a great amount of financial support for political parties every year, many parties receiving funding are still weak and unable to compete effectively in elections. Utilizing data from focus groups and extensive interviews with politicians, election commission officers, and party members, I demonstrate that financial deficiencies and a weak system of public finance allocation encouraged many small political parties—particularly those without parliamentary representation—to access these new state resources. Instead of helping to sustain the development of small and medium-sized-parties, the PPDF became an alternative source of income for those parties. Parties have intensified their efforts to exploit such funding using questionable means. Consequently, public party financing has contributed to an increase in corrupt practices in Thai party politics rather than strengthening party organizations as well as the party system.
format text
author Sirivunnabood, Punchada
author_facet Sirivunnabood, Punchada
author_sort Sirivunnabood, Punchada
title Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
title_short Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
title_full Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
title_fullStr Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Political Party Finance in Thailand: New Regulations but Old Practice
title_sort understanding political party finance in thailand: new regulations but old practice
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2018
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol17/iss3/2
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1134/viewcontent/RA1_Sirivunnabood_20030818.pdf
_version_ 1806510842825408512