A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government

Governance’s concept is well-established, multifarious, and too considerable in meanings, indicators, and frameworks, making it distinct to different people and unappealing to apply in lakes. Under this, governance ought to be reductionist-parsimony to be manageable and straightforward in refocusing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brillo, Bing Baltazar C.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol23/iss4/6
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1517/viewcontent/RA_205.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-1517
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-15172024-06-26T10:06:02Z A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government Brillo, Bing Baltazar C. Governance’s concept is well-established, multifarious, and too considerable in meanings, indicators, and frameworks, making it distinct to different people and unappealing to apply in lakes. Under this, governance ought to be reductionist-parsimony to be manageable and straightforward in refocusing the primary reference—lake governance. Lake governance’s concept is rarely utilized in scholarly literature nor acknowledged in the lake’s discourse. To ameliorate, the article intends to be a discourse—elucidate, understand, and contribute to lake governance’s analytical framework, respectively, the constituent’s interrelationship among the lake’s people, development, conservation, and the government, its most influential compartment. With this, lake governance asserts (a) development and conservation are associated but often discord and stand-alone; (b) lake’s people are contingent but commensurate with many or few communities; (c) lake’s people are affected by context-specific situations and multiple-various interests, making decisions problematic; (d) the government requires to penetrate and ultimately decide on the lake; and (e) the government is of utmost function as the universal principle in a lake. On the whole, the precept is that the administrative and managerial government presides over and perpetuates to enhance economic development by the people and to protect ecological conservation in the lake. 2023-12-30T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol23/iss4/6 info:doi/10.59588/2350-8329.1517 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1517/viewcontent/RA_205.pdf Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Animo Repository Concept Conservation Development Framework Government Governance Lake Lake Governance
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Concept
Conservation
Development
Framework
Government
Governance
Lake
Lake Governance
spellingShingle Concept
Conservation
Development
Framework
Government
Governance
Lake
Lake Governance
Brillo, Bing Baltazar C.
A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
description Governance’s concept is well-established, multifarious, and too considerable in meanings, indicators, and frameworks, making it distinct to different people and unappealing to apply in lakes. Under this, governance ought to be reductionist-parsimony to be manageable and straightforward in refocusing the primary reference—lake governance. Lake governance’s concept is rarely utilized in scholarly literature nor acknowledged in the lake’s discourse. To ameliorate, the article intends to be a discourse—elucidate, understand, and contribute to lake governance’s analytical framework, respectively, the constituent’s interrelationship among the lake’s people, development, conservation, and the government, its most influential compartment. With this, lake governance asserts (a) development and conservation are associated but often discord and stand-alone; (b) lake’s people are contingent but commensurate with many or few communities; (c) lake’s people are affected by context-specific situations and multiple-various interests, making decisions problematic; (d) the government requires to penetrate and ultimately decide on the lake; and (e) the government is of utmost function as the universal principle in a lake. On the whole, the precept is that the administrative and managerial government presides over and perpetuates to enhance economic development by the people and to protect ecological conservation in the lake.
format text
author Brillo, Bing Baltazar C.
author_facet Brillo, Bing Baltazar C.
author_sort Brillo, Bing Baltazar C.
title A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
title_short A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
title_full A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
title_fullStr A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
title_full_unstemmed A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Lake Governance: Lake’s People, Development, Conservation, and Government
title_sort conceptual framework for understanding lake governance: lake’s people, development, conservation, and government
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2023
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol23/iss4/6
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1517/viewcontent/RA_205.pdf
_version_ 1806510986333519872