Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand

The “best interests of the child” (BIC) is the most referenced child rights principle in international law, whereas juvenile justice is the most mentioned topic. This paper examines how countries in Southeast Asia (SEA) interpret BIC in juvenile justice and if their understanding is consistent with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agcaoili, Mary Grace C.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol24/iss2/3
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1533/viewcontent/RA_202.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-1533
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-15332024-06-26T12:30:03Z Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand Agcaoili, Mary Grace C. The “best interests of the child” (BIC) is the most referenced child rights principle in international law, whereas juvenile justice is the most mentioned topic. This paper examines how countries in Southeast Asia (SEA) interpret BIC in juvenile justice and if their understanding is consistent with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and other international standards and why. It contends that BIC’s indeterminate use led to misinterpretation of child rights and that BIC interpretation is influenced by several factors found within the socio-cultural and political economy of SEA. Using Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand as case studies for their representation of legal and socio-cultural traditions in SEA, this study applies a positivist and constructivist approach to qualitative research using surveys, jurisprudence, documentary research, and interviews with children and justice actors. It finds that CRC’s ratification and laws enacted with BIC therein do not guarantee the full protection of the rights of children in conflict with the law (CICL). It highlights the importance of using BIC cautiously, the value of asking children their BIC, and the need to deconstruct adult overgeneralizations on juvenile justice. As BIC is more than a legal concept, it recommends a constructivist approach in search of common values about childhood and justice across cultures. The study seeks to clarify the academic, legal, and practical interpretation of BIC in juvenile justice and to protect the rights of CICL in SEA. 2024-06-30T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol24/iss2/3 info:doi/10.59588/2350-8329.1533 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1533/viewcontent/RA_202.pdf Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Animo Repository best interests of the child child/juvenile justice restorative justice ASEAN Malaysia Philippines Thailand
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic best interests of the child
child/juvenile justice
restorative justice
ASEAN
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
spellingShingle best interests of the child
child/juvenile justice
restorative justice
ASEAN
Malaysia
Philippines
Thailand
Agcaoili, Mary Grace C.
Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
description The “best interests of the child” (BIC) is the most referenced child rights principle in international law, whereas juvenile justice is the most mentioned topic. This paper examines how countries in Southeast Asia (SEA) interpret BIC in juvenile justice and if their understanding is consistent with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and other international standards and why. It contends that BIC’s indeterminate use led to misinterpretation of child rights and that BIC interpretation is influenced by several factors found within the socio-cultural and political economy of SEA. Using Malaysia, the Philippines, and Thailand as case studies for their representation of legal and socio-cultural traditions in SEA, this study applies a positivist and constructivist approach to qualitative research using surveys, jurisprudence, documentary research, and interviews with children and justice actors. It finds that CRC’s ratification and laws enacted with BIC therein do not guarantee the full protection of the rights of children in conflict with the law (CICL). It highlights the importance of using BIC cautiously, the value of asking children their BIC, and the need to deconstruct adult overgeneralizations on juvenile justice. As BIC is more than a legal concept, it recommends a constructivist approach in search of common values about childhood and justice across cultures. The study seeks to clarify the academic, legal, and practical interpretation of BIC in juvenile justice and to protect the rights of CICL in SEA.
format text
author Agcaoili, Mary Grace C.
author_facet Agcaoili, Mary Grace C.
author_sort Agcaoili, Mary Grace C.
title Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
title_short Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
title_full Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
title_fullStr Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Best Interests of the Child in Juvenile Justice: Analysis of Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand
title_sort best interests of the child in juvenile justice: analysis of malaysia, philippines, and thailand
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2024
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol24/iss2/3
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1533/viewcontent/RA_202.pdf
_version_ 1806510990451277824