Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?

This legal research explores the interaction of internet and the two constitutional rights - Due Process Clause and Freedom of Speech Clause. The proponents discussed how the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy curtails the two-mentioned substantive right. The proponents find out that crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fama, Kimberly Lace L., Reyes, Harly Jayson U.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2007
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/10653
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-11298
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-112982021-10-10T02:00:37Z Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants? Fama, Kimberly Lace L. Reyes, Harly Jayson U. This legal research explores the interaction of internet and the two constitutional rights - Due Process Clause and Freedom of Speech Clause. The proponents discussed how the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy curtails the two-mentioned substantive right. The proponents find out that criticism is very significant in the business world. Such right to criticism is very significant in the business world. Such right to criticize should not be deprived to every individual living in a free and democratic society. If the UDRP will continue to curtail this substantive right - freedom of speech, harmonious relation among various countries might be at a risky condition. Moreover, a party who lost any case deserves the right to have his case reviewed. This is the essence of every due process - to find hope even in cases where there is slightest probability of winning. At the end, the proponents suggested recommendations on how to address the two sub-issues of the study. First, the proponents suggest that ICANN should take into consideration the findings of the proponents with regard to the possibility of free speech clause curtailment in parody-type cybersquatting. Specifically, the proponents, with regard to the issue on free speech clause, also suggest that a special panel should be created in arbitrating cases involving parody. Next, in terms of due process, the proponents recommend that a review board be created in order to efficiently decide on the various domain name disputes without curtailing due process clause. Lastly, the proponents recommend that further study on this field be conducted. 2007-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/10653 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
description This legal research explores the interaction of internet and the two constitutional rights - Due Process Clause and Freedom of Speech Clause. The proponents discussed how the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy curtails the two-mentioned substantive right. The proponents find out that criticism is very significant in the business world. Such right to criticism is very significant in the business world. Such right to criticize should not be deprived to every individual living in a free and democratic society. If the UDRP will continue to curtail this substantive right - freedom of speech, harmonious relation among various countries might be at a risky condition. Moreover, a party who lost any case deserves the right to have his case reviewed. This is the essence of every due process - to find hope even in cases where there is slightest probability of winning. At the end, the proponents suggested recommendations on how to address the two sub-issues of the study. First, the proponents suggest that ICANN should take into consideration the findings of the proponents with regard to the possibility of free speech clause curtailment in parody-type cybersquatting. Specifically, the proponents, with regard to the issue on free speech clause, also suggest that a special panel should be created in arbitrating cases involving parody. Next, in terms of due process, the proponents recommend that a review board be created in order to efficiently decide on the various domain name disputes without curtailing due process clause. Lastly, the proponents recommend that further study on this field be conducted.
format text
author Fama, Kimberly Lace L.
Reyes, Harly Jayson U.
spellingShingle Fama, Kimberly Lace L.
Reyes, Harly Jayson U.
Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
author_facet Fama, Kimberly Lace L.
Reyes, Harly Jayson U.
author_sort Fama, Kimberly Lace L.
title Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
title_short Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
title_full Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
title_fullStr Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
title_full_unstemmed Uniform dispute resolution policy: A violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
title_sort uniform dispute resolution policy: a violation of the legal rights of domain name registrants?
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2007
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/10653
_version_ 1713388573474947072