First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?

Republic Act 8293, also known as the Intellectual Property Code, took effect last January 1, 1998. It amended Republic Act 165 (Patent Law), Republic Act 166 (Trademark Law) and Presidential Decree 49 (Copyright Law). There were several changes made in our patent law. One of its changes is the shift...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiu, Jocelyn, Clemente, Katrina
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/11321
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-11966
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-119662021-09-17T05:37:06Z First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional? Chiu, Jocelyn Clemente, Katrina Republic Act 8293, also known as the Intellectual Property Code, took effect last January 1, 1998. It amended Republic Act 165 (Patent Law), Republic Act 166 (Trademark Law) and Presidential Decree 49 (Copyright Law). There were several changes made in our patent law. One of its changes is the shift from first-to-invent to the first-to-file rule for patent registration. Said shift was done in view of harmonization, in compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. This paper is a study of whether or not the shift in the system of patent registration: first-to-invent to first-to-file rule is violative of our Constitution. The Constitutional provisions regarding science and technology will be discussed in light of the Intellectual Property Code. Does the first-to-file rule in patent registration carry out the State's objective to prioritize inventions and research & development? Does the first-to-file violate the exclusive rights of scientists and inventors? 2003-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/11321 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Legal Education
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Legal Education
spellingShingle Legal Education
Chiu, Jocelyn
Clemente, Katrina
First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
description Republic Act 8293, also known as the Intellectual Property Code, took effect last January 1, 1998. It amended Republic Act 165 (Patent Law), Republic Act 166 (Trademark Law) and Presidential Decree 49 (Copyright Law). There were several changes made in our patent law. One of its changes is the shift from first-to-invent to the first-to-file rule for patent registration. Said shift was done in view of harmonization, in compliance with the TRIPS Agreement. This paper is a study of whether or not the shift in the system of patent registration: first-to-invent to first-to-file rule is violative of our Constitution. The Constitutional provisions regarding science and technology will be discussed in light of the Intellectual Property Code. Does the first-to-file rule in patent registration carry out the State's objective to prioritize inventions and research & development? Does the first-to-file violate the exclusive rights of scientists and inventors?
format text
author Chiu, Jocelyn
Clemente, Katrina
author_facet Chiu, Jocelyn
Clemente, Katrina
author_sort Chiu, Jocelyn
title First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
title_short First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
title_full First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
title_fullStr First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
title_full_unstemmed First-to-file rule: Is it constitutional?
title_sort first-to-file rule: is it constitutional?
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2003
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/11321
_version_ 1712577454156021760