The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel

The Anti-Terrorism Bill is first in Congress by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in 1996 to address the threat that terrorism brings to our country. As a result of events such as terrorism, the Philippines must be able to promulgate and implement a law to maintain peace and order in our territory. The purp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O., Veneracion, Anna Patricia L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/17783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-18296
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-182962021-12-07T06:31:07Z The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O. Veneracion, Anna Patricia L. The Anti-Terrorism Bill is first in Congress by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in 1996 to address the threat that terrorism brings to our country. As a result of events such as terrorism, the Philippines must be able to promulgate and implement a law to maintain peace and order in our territory. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the constitutionality of the Human Security Act in relation to the Bill of Rights particularly the liberty to travel as implemented in the 1987 Constitution. The Human Security Act is an act to secure the State and protect our people from Terrorism. Since it was passed, many human rights advocates and activities have opposed such act. In this study, we aim to study whether or not certain sections of the HAS may or may not be in conflict with the fundamental liberty to travel. Furthermore, this study shows an adequate comparison between the Human Security Act of 2007 and the US Patriot Act with regards to the aforementioned subject which may be beneficial to anyone if they understand why the proper promulgation of this Act is essential. Qualitative research methodology was used in this study for this is the only method fit and applicable for this study. The qualitative data was gathered by using provisions of the two laws to be evaluated in this study: the Human Security Act of 2007 and the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Also, the authors used books, journals, and online articles for their review of related literature. The authors contemplate that our Anti-Terrorism Law is imperative as to its existence but it cannot function effectively of there are elements within the Act that surpass the laws made before it. 2010-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/17783 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Commercial Law
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Commercial Law
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O.
Veneracion, Anna Patricia L.
The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
description The Anti-Terrorism Bill is first in Congress by Senator Juan Ponce Enrile in 1996 to address the threat that terrorism brings to our country. As a result of events such as terrorism, the Philippines must be able to promulgate and implement a law to maintain peace and order in our territory. The purpose of this study is to review and evaluate the constitutionality of the Human Security Act in relation to the Bill of Rights particularly the liberty to travel as implemented in the 1987 Constitution. The Human Security Act is an act to secure the State and protect our people from Terrorism. Since it was passed, many human rights advocates and activities have opposed such act. In this study, we aim to study whether or not certain sections of the HAS may or may not be in conflict with the fundamental liberty to travel. Furthermore, this study shows an adequate comparison between the Human Security Act of 2007 and the US Patriot Act with regards to the aforementioned subject which may be beneficial to anyone if they understand why the proper promulgation of this Act is essential. Qualitative research methodology was used in this study for this is the only method fit and applicable for this study. The qualitative data was gathered by using provisions of the two laws to be evaluated in this study: the Human Security Act of 2007 and the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Also, the authors used books, journals, and online articles for their review of related literature. The authors contemplate that our Anti-Terrorism Law is imperative as to its existence but it cannot function effectively of there are elements within the Act that surpass the laws made before it.
format text
author Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O.
Veneracion, Anna Patricia L.
author_facet Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O.
Veneracion, Anna Patricia L.
author_sort Carbonell, Zhanika Marie O.
title The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
title_short The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
title_full The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
title_fullStr The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
title_full_unstemmed The human security act of 2007: Whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
title_sort human security act of 2007: whether or not it violates a person's constitutional liberty to travel
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2010
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/17783
_version_ 1719000519738916864