The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond

Tilapia nilotica fingerlings were stocked at a density of 20 fish/m3 in fixed net cages for 90 days in a pond in Imus, Cavite. These were reared using three formulated feeds of 35 percent crude protein content prepared from three aquatic weeds namely: Azolla sp., Eichornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ilano, Adrian S.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/1139
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-2139
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-21392021-06-18T06:23:38Z The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond Ilano, Adrian S. Tilapia nilotica fingerlings were stocked at a density of 20 fish/m3 in fixed net cages for 90 days in a pond in Imus, Cavite. These were reared using three formulated feeds of 35 percent crude protein content prepared from three aquatic weeds namely: Azolla sp., Eichornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth), and Ipomoea aquatica (Kangkong) on 29 May-27 August 1992 and 12 September-10 December 1992. Using Pearson's Square Method, Feed Type 11 was formulated from 40 percent Azolla sp. and 60 percent Ipomoea aquatica by dry weight, Feed type III was formulated from 40 percent Azolla sp. and 60 percent Ipomoea aquatica by dry weight, Feed Type III was formulated from 37.5 percent Azolla sp. and 62.5 percent Eichornia crassipes by dry weight, Eichornia crassipes and Feed Type IV was formulated from 29 percent Ipomoea aquatica and 71 percent by dry weight. Commercial feed acquired from Bio-research served as a control (Feed Type I). Feeds were dispensed twice daily at a total ration equivalent to Ratio (FCR) was computed. Growth rates expressed as weight increments (grams) per unit time (day) and and percentage weight gain were recorded and compared. Cost of feed formulation was also computed. Physico-chemical factors such as dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, and turbidity were determined. 1993-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/1139 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Tilapia Feeds Aquatic plants Fishes--Feeding and feeds Fish-culture Weeds as feed
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Tilapia
Feeds
Aquatic plants
Fishes--Feeding and feeds
Fish-culture
Weeds as feed
spellingShingle Tilapia
Feeds
Aquatic plants
Fishes--Feeding and feeds
Fish-culture
Weeds as feed
Ilano, Adrian S.
The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
description Tilapia nilotica fingerlings were stocked at a density of 20 fish/m3 in fixed net cages for 90 days in a pond in Imus, Cavite. These were reared using three formulated feeds of 35 percent crude protein content prepared from three aquatic weeds namely: Azolla sp., Eichornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth), and Ipomoea aquatica (Kangkong) on 29 May-27 August 1992 and 12 September-10 December 1992. Using Pearson's Square Method, Feed Type 11 was formulated from 40 percent Azolla sp. and 60 percent Ipomoea aquatica by dry weight, Feed type III was formulated from 40 percent Azolla sp. and 60 percent Ipomoea aquatica by dry weight, Feed Type III was formulated from 37.5 percent Azolla sp. and 62.5 percent Eichornia crassipes by dry weight, Eichornia crassipes and Feed Type IV was formulated from 29 percent Ipomoea aquatica and 71 percent by dry weight. Commercial feed acquired from Bio-research served as a control (Feed Type I). Feeds were dispensed twice daily at a total ration equivalent to Ratio (FCR) was computed. Growth rates expressed as weight increments (grams) per unit time (day) and and percentage weight gain were recorded and compared. Cost of feed formulation was also computed. Physico-chemical factors such as dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, and turbidity were determined.
format text
author Ilano, Adrian S.
author_facet Ilano, Adrian S.
author_sort Ilano, Adrian S.
title The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
title_short The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
title_full The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
title_fullStr The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
title_full_unstemmed The utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for Tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
title_sort utilization of three aquatic plants as alternative feed for tilapia nilotica cultured in an earthen pond
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 1993
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/1139
_version_ 1712575666543656960