Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila

Ordinance No. 8233 was passed by the City Council of Manila in 2011, repealing Ordinance 7777, effectively lifting the ban on reclamation in Manila Bay Land reclamation: the process of filling submerged or underwater areas with dredge fill, land fill and/or other appropriate materials to create usab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heraldo, Maria Cleo A., Urbano, Mary Yasmine V.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2013
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5589
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-6006
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-60062022-03-04T01:57:08Z Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila Heraldo, Maria Cleo A. Urbano, Mary Yasmine V. Ordinance No. 8233 was passed by the City Council of Manila in 2011, repealing Ordinance 7777, effectively lifting the ban on reclamation in Manila Bay Land reclamation: the process of filling submerged or underwater areas with dredge fill, land fill and/or other appropriate materials to create usable land. In 2012, Manila Goldcoast Development Corp. entered into a Contractual Consortium Agreement with the City of Manila, through then-Mayor Alfredo Lim, to reclaim a portion of Manila Bay for commercial purposes. The contract involved a 148-hectare entertainment hub, dubbed the "Solar City", which was projected to 10 times the size of Rockwell Power Plant Mall and twice that of the Luneta Park. The said project area covers the southern end of Manila Bay on the City, including portions, fronting the Manila Yacht Club and the Philippine Navy.The authors intended to assess the contract between the City Council of Manila and Manila Goldcoast Development Corp. whether it is valid or not for there are certain coalitions who are crying foul that the said agreement is in violation of Republic Act 7586 and Republic Act 100066. They are claiming that these laws are protecting the bay and therefore reclamation should not be done. This thesis will discuss the reclamation laws in the Philippines and will conclude whether reclamation is allowed in Manila Bay. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5589 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Reclamation of land—Law and legislation--Philippines Contracts--Philippines--Manila Protected areas—Law and legislation--Philippines Environmental Law Law
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Reclamation of land—Law and legislation--Philippines
Contracts--Philippines--Manila
Protected areas—Law and legislation--Philippines
Environmental Law
Law
spellingShingle Reclamation of land—Law and legislation--Philippines
Contracts--Philippines--Manila
Protected areas—Law and legislation--Philippines
Environmental Law
Law
Heraldo, Maria Cleo A.
Urbano, Mary Yasmine V.
Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
description Ordinance No. 8233 was passed by the City Council of Manila in 2011, repealing Ordinance 7777, effectively lifting the ban on reclamation in Manila Bay Land reclamation: the process of filling submerged or underwater areas with dredge fill, land fill and/or other appropriate materials to create usable land. In 2012, Manila Goldcoast Development Corp. entered into a Contractual Consortium Agreement with the City of Manila, through then-Mayor Alfredo Lim, to reclaim a portion of Manila Bay for commercial purposes. The contract involved a 148-hectare entertainment hub, dubbed the "Solar City", which was projected to 10 times the size of Rockwell Power Plant Mall and twice that of the Luneta Park. The said project area covers the southern end of Manila Bay on the City, including portions, fronting the Manila Yacht Club and the Philippine Navy.The authors intended to assess the contract between the City Council of Manila and Manila Goldcoast Development Corp. whether it is valid or not for there are certain coalitions who are crying foul that the said agreement is in violation of Republic Act 7586 and Republic Act 100066. They are claiming that these laws are protecting the bay and therefore reclamation should not be done. This thesis will discuss the reclamation laws in the Philippines and will conclude whether reclamation is allowed in Manila Bay.
format text
author Heraldo, Maria Cleo A.
Urbano, Mary Yasmine V.
author_facet Heraldo, Maria Cleo A.
Urbano, Mary Yasmine V.
author_sort Heraldo, Maria Cleo A.
title Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
title_short Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
title_full Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
title_fullStr Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the validity of the contract between Manila Goldcoast Development and the City of Manila
title_sort assessing the validity of the contract between manila goldcoast development and the city of manila
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2013
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5589
_version_ 1728621058625372160