Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge

This research will look into, and then seek to resolve the constitutional conflicts in the Rules on Civil Forfeiture (Sec 27 and 28), allowing a proceeding for civil forfeiture to prosper without prior criminal charge or conviction of an individual, allegedly possessing ill-gotten wealth.As it is be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R., Plantilla, Immaculate Mariel C.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5612
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-6170
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-61702021-05-07T02:22:05Z Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R. Plantilla, Immaculate Mariel C. This research will look into, and then seek to resolve the constitutional conflicts in the Rules on Civil Forfeiture (Sec 27 and 28), allowing a proceeding for civil forfeiture to prosper without prior criminal charge or conviction of an individual, allegedly possessing ill-gotten wealth.As it is believed that a civil forfeiture proceeding is intimately connected with a criminal proceeding convicting the possessor of ill-gotten wealth with a crime (e.g. money laundering), it will be anchored on the right of the accused, as granted by the 1987 Philippine Constitution, stating that a person should be assured due process of law and declaring that one should be deemed innocent until proven guilty. It will also make use of principles and theories related to legal philosophy in order to facilitate further discussions on whether justice is properly administered through the present practice of civil forfeiture.In order to provide a deeper insight into the constitutionality of civil forfeiture, the study will first look into the original intent of forfeiture-related laws by tracing its roots through existing Philippine laws and jurisprudence. Also, it will clarify the difference between civil forfeiture and related legal terms, such as preliminary injunction and preliminary attachment. It will then review the concepts of forfeiture as discussed in journals, and studies conducted prior. Discussions of these concepts will have a simultaneous discourse on selected schools of thought in legal philosophy. Finally, this study seeks to understand civil forfeiture through seeing how it has evolved over time, and how it has responded to the call of justice in the changing times. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5612 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Forfeiture--Philippines Civil Law Property Law and Real Estate
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Forfeiture--Philippines
Civil Law
Property Law and Real Estate
spellingShingle Forfeiture--Philippines
Civil Law
Property Law and Real Estate
Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R.
Plantilla, Immaculate Mariel C.
Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
description This research will look into, and then seek to resolve the constitutional conflicts in the Rules on Civil Forfeiture (Sec 27 and 28), allowing a proceeding for civil forfeiture to prosper without prior criminal charge or conviction of an individual, allegedly possessing ill-gotten wealth.As it is believed that a civil forfeiture proceeding is intimately connected with a criminal proceeding convicting the possessor of ill-gotten wealth with a crime (e.g. money laundering), it will be anchored on the right of the accused, as granted by the 1987 Philippine Constitution, stating that a person should be assured due process of law and declaring that one should be deemed innocent until proven guilty. It will also make use of principles and theories related to legal philosophy in order to facilitate further discussions on whether justice is properly administered through the present practice of civil forfeiture.In order to provide a deeper insight into the constitutionality of civil forfeiture, the study will first look into the original intent of forfeiture-related laws by tracing its roots through existing Philippine laws and jurisprudence. Also, it will clarify the difference between civil forfeiture and related legal terms, such as preliminary injunction and preliminary attachment. It will then review the concepts of forfeiture as discussed in journals, and studies conducted prior. Discussions of these concepts will have a simultaneous discourse on selected schools of thought in legal philosophy. Finally, this study seeks to understand civil forfeiture through seeing how it has evolved over time, and how it has responded to the call of justice in the changing times.
format text
author Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R.
Plantilla, Immaculate Mariel C.
author_facet Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R.
Plantilla, Immaculate Mariel C.
author_sort Fernandez, Johannah Marielle R.
title Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
title_short Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
title_full Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
title_fullStr Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
title_full_unstemmed Guilty until proven innocent: A study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
title_sort guilty until proven innocent: a study on the constitutionality of civil forfeiture without prior criminal charge
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2015
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/5612
_version_ 1712576427755307008