Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA)
Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is an infrastructure-less network that plays an important role in communication and mobility in the rapidly advancing world. Each mobile device, also known as a node, acts as a router in order to communicate, thus heavily relying on the resources of each node to forward...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/6151 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Language: | English |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-6795 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_bachelors-67952021-07-14T12:42:37Z Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) Fuentes, Earleen Jane P. Lim, Regeene Melarese P. Tapia, Franklin Benjamin Y Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is an infrastructure-less network that plays an important role in communication and mobility in the rapidly advancing world. Each mobile device, also known as a node, acts as a router in order to communicate, thus heavily relying on the resources of each node to forward data. However, due to the resource constraints of a node such as memory, computing power, and energy, nodes may become selective in forwarding data. These nodes, a type of selfish node also known as misleading nodes, degrade the performance of the network and waste the resources of other nodes. Several reputation-based techniques (e.g. CORE, CONFIDANT, LARS, SORI, OCEAN) and acknowledgment-based techniques (e.g. TWOACK, S-TWOACK, EAACK) have been proposed in order to detect selfish nodes. Despite the acknowledgment-based techniques being able to address the issue of reputation-based techniques of being unable to appropriately punish misleading nodes, these techniques negatively affect cooperative nodes and generate large network overhead. Addressing this problem, this study aims to develop a technique that appropriately punishes misleading nodes without generating a very high overhead. In the tests performed, MINDRA generally performed better than purely DSR (i.e.no reputation system used) and OCEAN, as it appropriately punished misleading nodes and satisfied the metrics (i.e. packet delivery ratio test, throughput radio test, false positive test, false negative test, detection time test and overhead test) of the experiments. 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/6151 Bachelor's Theses English Animo Repository Ad hoc networks (Computer networks) |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
language |
English |
topic |
Ad hoc networks (Computer networks) |
spellingShingle |
Ad hoc networks (Computer networks) Fuentes, Earleen Jane P. Lim, Regeene Melarese P. Tapia, Franklin Benjamin Y Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
description |
Mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is an infrastructure-less network that plays an important role in communication and mobility in the rapidly advancing world. Each mobile device, also known as a node, acts as a router in order to communicate, thus heavily relying on the resources of each node to forward data. However, due to the resource constraints of a node such as memory, computing power, and energy, nodes may become selective in forwarding data. These nodes, a type of selfish node also known as misleading nodes, degrade the performance of the network and waste the resources of other nodes. Several reputation-based techniques (e.g. CORE, CONFIDANT, LARS, SORI, OCEAN) and acknowledgment-based techniques (e.g. TWOACK, S-TWOACK, EAACK) have been proposed in order to detect selfish nodes. Despite the acknowledgment-based techniques being able to address the issue of reputation-based techniques of being unable to appropriately punish misleading nodes, these techniques negatively affect cooperative nodes and generate large network overhead. Addressing this problem, this study aims to develop a technique that appropriately punishes misleading nodes without generating a very high overhead. In the tests performed, MINDRA generally performed better than purely DSR (i.e.no reputation system used) and OCEAN, as it appropriately punished misleading nodes and satisfied the metrics (i.e. packet delivery ratio test, throughput radio test, false positive test, false negative test, detection time test and overhead test) of the experiments. |
format |
text |
author |
Fuentes, Earleen Jane P. Lim, Regeene Melarese P. Tapia, Franklin Benjamin Y |
author_facet |
Fuentes, Earleen Jane P. Lim, Regeene Melarese P. Tapia, Franklin Benjamin Y |
author_sort |
Fuentes, Earleen Jane P. |
title |
Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
title_short |
Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
title_full |
Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
title_fullStr |
Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (MINDRA) |
title_sort |
misleading node detection and response mechanism in mobile ad-hoc network (mindra) |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/6151 |
_version_ |
1712576551795556352 |