Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich

In reality, philosophy and theology are related but a dualistic thinking sees the two as separated. Their relationship is manifested in all human constructs and activities and there are certain phenomena wherein it is highlighted such as atheism, theism and atheistic theology. These three, however,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ayubo, Anthony Ben
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/283
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_doctoral/article/1282/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/CDTG004744_F.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-1282
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-12822024-02-14T06:17:38Z Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich Ayubo, Anthony Ben In reality, philosophy and theology are related but a dualistic thinking sees the two as separated. Their relationship is manifested in all human constructs and activities and there are certain phenomena wherein it is highlighted such as atheism, theism and atheistic theology. These three, however, function in the dualistic mould. Atheism uses the conflicting process and comes up with the antagonistic kind of relationship. Theism and atheistic theology use synthesizing process and come up with the subservient and compromised relationships, respectively. Such relationships are inappropriate for philosophy and theology and bring with them many difficulties. Ontological courage is an alternative to dualism in that it considers the divergences and convergences of philosophy and theology but does not translate these into conflict or synthesis as in the polarity of magnetic poles. Philosophy and theology remains to be independent while being interdependent in a relationship. There is the triad of (a) philosophy, (b) theology, and (c) the relationship between philosophy and theology where the third (c) does not get synthesized into labels such as philotheology or theo-philosophy. Instead of definite labels or clear designations, the relationship is better described in a constellation of terms to avoid any dualistic translation. These descriptions are derived from ontological courage while continually listening to, and avoiding the difficulties, of inappropriate relationships. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/283 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_doctoral/article/1282/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/CDTG004744_F.pdf Dissertations English Animo Repository Philosophy and religion Dualism God—Proof, Ontological Philosophy Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Philosophy and religion
Dualism
God—Proof, Ontological
Philosophy
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
spellingShingle Philosophy and religion
Dualism
God—Proof, Ontological
Philosophy
Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion
Ayubo, Anthony Ben
Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
description In reality, philosophy and theology are related but a dualistic thinking sees the two as separated. Their relationship is manifested in all human constructs and activities and there are certain phenomena wherein it is highlighted such as atheism, theism and atheistic theology. These three, however, function in the dualistic mould. Atheism uses the conflicting process and comes up with the antagonistic kind of relationship. Theism and atheistic theology use synthesizing process and come up with the subservient and compromised relationships, respectively. Such relationships are inappropriate for philosophy and theology and bring with them many difficulties. Ontological courage is an alternative to dualism in that it considers the divergences and convergences of philosophy and theology but does not translate these into conflict or synthesis as in the polarity of magnetic poles. Philosophy and theology remains to be independent while being interdependent in a relationship. There is the triad of (a) philosophy, (b) theology, and (c) the relationship between philosophy and theology where the third (c) does not get synthesized into labels such as philotheology or theo-philosophy. Instead of definite labels or clear designations, the relationship is better described in a constellation of terms to avoid any dualistic translation. These descriptions are derived from ontological courage while continually listening to, and avoiding the difficulties, of inappropriate relationships.
format text
author Ayubo, Anthony Ben
author_facet Ayubo, Anthony Ben
author_sort Ayubo, Anthony Ben
title Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
title_short Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
title_full Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
title_fullStr Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
title_full_unstemmed Ontological courage versus dualism: The relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of Paul Tillich
title_sort ontological courage versus dualism: the relationship of philosophy and theology in the thought of paul tillich
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2009
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/283
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_doctoral/article/1282/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/CDTG004744_F.pdf
_version_ 1792202440286666752