Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how Philippine medical practitioners perceive and negotiate ethical dilemmas they encounter in the course of their clinical practice. The study used the grounded theory method of Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Strauss and Corbin (1990) with in-dept...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Estacio, Rhodora Carino
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/346
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-1345
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-13452021-11-16T06:09:17Z Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas Estacio, Rhodora Carino The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how Philippine medical practitioners perceive and negotiate ethical dilemmas they encounter in the course of their clinical practice. The study used the grounded theory method of Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Strauss and Corbin (1990) with in-depth, semi-structured interviews to understand the lived experiences of twenty eight (28) participants whose age ranged from 27-70 years. After open coding of transcripts of interviews, axial coding and selective coding of emerged concepts, six distinct yet related categories were identified namely a.) the nature of an ethical dilemma, b.) causal conditions triggering the dilemmas, c.) contextual conditions of the ethical challenges, d.) intervening conditions affecting the negotiation of the dilemmas, e.) action/ strategies in resolving the dilemmas and f.) outcome/consequences of the decision on these ethical challenges. The core category of Doing Right for Patients was identified as the central theory that emerged. The study revealed that the processes could serve as a grounded typology in which physician participants gain a better hold of how they live, grasp, and deal with their decision-making regarding ethical dilemmas and what it means to do right for patients. The results of this study suggest that an understanding of the perceptions and negotiations of ethical dilemmas among physicians may lead to recognition and greater comprehension of their leadership role among other healthcare providers in the healthcare organizations. It also pointed to development of new models of medical ethics education that is more attuned to culture and context of Philippine society. Likewise, there is clear implication for educational leaders to seriously consider the inclusion of leadership-management courses in the medical curriculum. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/346 Dissertations English Animo Repository Physicians--Philippines Ethical problems Educational Leadership
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Physicians--Philippines
Ethical problems
Educational Leadership
spellingShingle Physicians--Philippines
Ethical problems
Educational Leadership
Estacio, Rhodora Carino
Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
description The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how Philippine medical practitioners perceive and negotiate ethical dilemmas they encounter in the course of their clinical practice. The study used the grounded theory method of Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Strauss and Corbin (1990) with in-depth, semi-structured interviews to understand the lived experiences of twenty eight (28) participants whose age ranged from 27-70 years. After open coding of transcripts of interviews, axial coding and selective coding of emerged concepts, six distinct yet related categories were identified namely a.) the nature of an ethical dilemma, b.) causal conditions triggering the dilemmas, c.) contextual conditions of the ethical challenges, d.) intervening conditions affecting the negotiation of the dilemmas, e.) action/ strategies in resolving the dilemmas and f.) outcome/consequences of the decision on these ethical challenges. The core category of Doing Right for Patients was identified as the central theory that emerged. The study revealed that the processes could serve as a grounded typology in which physician participants gain a better hold of how they live, grasp, and deal with their decision-making regarding ethical dilemmas and what it means to do right for patients. The results of this study suggest that an understanding of the perceptions and negotiations of ethical dilemmas among physicians may lead to recognition and greater comprehension of their leadership role among other healthcare providers in the healthcare organizations. It also pointed to development of new models of medical ethics education that is more attuned to culture and context of Philippine society. Likewise, there is clear implication for educational leaders to seriously consider the inclusion of leadership-management courses in the medical curriculum.
format text
author Estacio, Rhodora Carino
author_facet Estacio, Rhodora Carino
author_sort Estacio, Rhodora Carino
title Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
title_short Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
title_full Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
title_fullStr Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
title_full_unstemmed Doing right for patients: A grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
title_sort doing right for patients: a grounded theory on physicians' understanding and negotiation of ethical dilemmas
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2013
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/346
_version_ 1772834449120034816