Conceptual understanding of force and motion

This study attempted to determine to common conceptions of fourth year high school students. A 25- item open-ended Force Concept Inventory (FCI) was used as an instrument. One hundred forty five respondents: 53 coming from Pangasinan National High School; 48 from Ilocos Sur National High School; and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tolosa, Christopher Reyes
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3424
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-10262
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-102622021-01-04T02:51:25Z Conceptual understanding of force and motion Tolosa, Christopher Reyes This study attempted to determine to common conceptions of fourth year high school students. A 25- item open-ended Force Concept Inventory (FCI) was used as an instrument. One hundred forty five respondents: 53 coming from Pangasinan National High School; 48 from Ilocos Sur National High School; and 44 from La Union National High School were used in this research. The test was coupled with unstructured interview to provide an indepth analysis and interpretation of data gathered together with written response. The responses were categorized based from the ready- made options of the original multiple- choice Force Concept Inventory. The data were analyzed and interpreted using descriptive research method. Results revealed that the respondents are classified as Non- Newtonian thinkers. They are found to manifest the following misconceptions: a) The misconception on action/ reaction pairs, most active agent produces force and (b) greater mass implies greater force; (c) Both misconception on Kinematics, the discrimination of position from velocity and (d) the discrimination of velocity from acceleration; and on (e) obstacles exert no force. Likewise, majority of the respondents showed inability to recognize inertial motion. Other conceptions on force and motion were also identified that do not fall under the original categories of options in the multiple- choice Force Concept Inventory. None of the respondents were classified as Newtonian thinkers. 2005-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3424 Master's Theses English Animo Repository Force and energy--Study and teaching (Secondary) Motion
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Force and energy--Study and teaching (Secondary)
Motion
spellingShingle Force and energy--Study and teaching (Secondary)
Motion
Tolosa, Christopher Reyes
Conceptual understanding of force and motion
description This study attempted to determine to common conceptions of fourth year high school students. A 25- item open-ended Force Concept Inventory (FCI) was used as an instrument. One hundred forty five respondents: 53 coming from Pangasinan National High School; 48 from Ilocos Sur National High School; and 44 from La Union National High School were used in this research. The test was coupled with unstructured interview to provide an indepth analysis and interpretation of data gathered together with written response. The responses were categorized based from the ready- made options of the original multiple- choice Force Concept Inventory. The data were analyzed and interpreted using descriptive research method. Results revealed that the respondents are classified as Non- Newtonian thinkers. They are found to manifest the following misconceptions: a) The misconception on action/ reaction pairs, most active agent produces force and (b) greater mass implies greater force; (c) Both misconception on Kinematics, the discrimination of position from velocity and (d) the discrimination of velocity from acceleration; and on (e) obstacles exert no force. Likewise, majority of the respondents showed inability to recognize inertial motion. Other conceptions on force and motion were also identified that do not fall under the original categories of options in the multiple- choice Force Concept Inventory. None of the respondents were classified as Newtonian thinkers.
format text
author Tolosa, Christopher Reyes
author_facet Tolosa, Christopher Reyes
author_sort Tolosa, Christopher Reyes
title Conceptual understanding of force and motion
title_short Conceptual understanding of force and motion
title_full Conceptual understanding of force and motion
title_fullStr Conceptual understanding of force and motion
title_full_unstemmed Conceptual understanding of force and motion
title_sort conceptual understanding of force and motion
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2005
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3424
_version_ 1712575172631855104