Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration

Mismanagement of water resources is the main reason of water scarcity. Process Integration aims to optimize interrelationships of process units to improve performance in terms of cost minimization, energy efficiency or operability. Evolutionary search techniques have been studied extensively to appr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Col-long, Kristine Joy
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3441
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10279/viewcontent/CDTG004182_P__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-10279
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-102792022-02-16T02:51:19Z Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration Col-long, Kristine Joy Mismanagement of water resources is the main reason of water scarcity. Process Integration aims to optimize interrelationships of process units to improve performance in terms of cost minimization, energy efficiency or operability. Evolutionary search techniques have been studied extensively to approach these types of MINLP problems. A recently introduced algorithm called particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been applied in water network synthesis (Hul, 2006). This paper proposes enhancements to PSO technique. a-PSO incorporates the leader-follower concept into the algorithm to provide direction when searching for optimal positions. The leader holds the focal position in the swarm and knows the performance of all follower particles while the latter refers to the leader for direction. The velocity and position update functions are modified as follows: for the leader: vt a +1 = wvit + c1R1 ( pi best - xt a ) + c2R2 ( gbest - xt a ) (1) xt a 1 + = xt a + vit +1 (2) for the followers: vit +1 = vit + c1R1 ( pi best - xit ) + c2R2 ( xt a - xit ) (3) xit +1 = xit + vit +1 (4) Figure 1 (Above): a-PSO algorithm Figure 2 (Right): -PSO algorithm Is an optimum solution derived? Is the stdev below the threshold value? Initialize the position of the particles Update vt a +1 , xt a +1 , vit +1 and xit +1 Identify the leader START For every function evaluation Evaluate the objective function YES Reinitialize the followers END NO Determine stdev of the pbests YES NO Is an optimum solution derived? Initialize the position of the particles Update vt a +1 , xt a +1 , vit +1 and xit +1 Identify the leader START Evaluate the objective function YES END NO -PSO was developed from µ-GA, a small-population genetic algorithm with an adaptive reinitialization process which prevents loss of population diversity. The reset mechanism happens when the position of the particles falls below a standard deviation threshold at each iteration. A hypothetical plant from Polley and Polley (2000) was used to study the performance of the two novel algorithms. Initially, four processes require a total of 300t/h of water while discharging 280t/h of effluent. By adding just one interconnection from source 2 to sink 3, the freshwater input and wastewater generation are reduced by more than 25%. The figure on the left presents the optimal network with 1 link. Figure 3: Optimal water network for Polley and Polley (2000) case study The objective function is expressed as equation (5) while equations (6) to (8) show the mass balance and topological constraints. Min j wj F (5) Fwj + Fi, j - F j,k - F j,out = 0 (6) Fi, j (Ci out max , - Cj in max , ) - Fwj Cj in max , 0 (7) aij = N (8) where 1 if Fij rij > 0 aij = 0 if Fij rij = 0 Figure 4 shows that while three PSO variations result to satisfactory solutions, a-PSO and -PSO converge faster and provide quality solutions complying with the constraints. Figure 4: Comparison of results using a-PSO (A), PSO (B) and -PSO (C) 80 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 No. of iterations Water Budget A B C 50 20 70 60 D1 D4 D3 D2 S1 S2 S3 S4 100 50 70. 2006-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3441 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10279/viewcontent/CDTG004182_P__1_.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository Chemical processes Optimization techniques Mathematical optimization Water resources development Process Control and Systems
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Chemical processes
Optimization techniques
Mathematical optimization
Water resources development
Process Control and Systems
spellingShingle Chemical processes
Optimization techniques
Mathematical optimization
Water resources development
Process Control and Systems
Col-long, Kristine Joy
Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
description Mismanagement of water resources is the main reason of water scarcity. Process Integration aims to optimize interrelationships of process units to improve performance in terms of cost minimization, energy efficiency or operability. Evolutionary search techniques have been studied extensively to approach these types of MINLP problems. A recently introduced algorithm called particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been applied in water network synthesis (Hul, 2006). This paper proposes enhancements to PSO technique. a-PSO incorporates the leader-follower concept into the algorithm to provide direction when searching for optimal positions. The leader holds the focal position in the swarm and knows the performance of all follower particles while the latter refers to the leader for direction. The velocity and position update functions are modified as follows: for the leader: vt a +1 = wvit + c1R1 ( pi best - xt a ) + c2R2 ( gbest - xt a ) (1) xt a 1 + = xt a + vit +1 (2) for the followers: vit +1 = vit + c1R1 ( pi best - xit ) + c2R2 ( xt a - xit ) (3) xit +1 = xit + vit +1 (4) Figure 1 (Above): a-PSO algorithm Figure 2 (Right): -PSO algorithm Is an optimum solution derived? Is the stdev below the threshold value? Initialize the position of the particles Update vt a +1 , xt a +1 , vit +1 and xit +1 Identify the leader START For every function evaluation Evaluate the objective function YES Reinitialize the followers END NO Determine stdev of the pbests YES NO Is an optimum solution derived? Initialize the position of the particles Update vt a +1 , xt a +1 , vit +1 and xit +1 Identify the leader START Evaluate the objective function YES END NO -PSO was developed from µ-GA, a small-population genetic algorithm with an adaptive reinitialization process which prevents loss of population diversity. The reset mechanism happens when the position of the particles falls below a standard deviation threshold at each iteration. A hypothetical plant from Polley and Polley (2000) was used to study the performance of the two novel algorithms. Initially, four processes require a total of 300t/h of water while discharging 280t/h of effluent. By adding just one interconnection from source 2 to sink 3, the freshwater input and wastewater generation are reduced by more than 25%. The figure on the left presents the optimal network with 1 link. Figure 3: Optimal water network for Polley and Polley (2000) case study The objective function is expressed as equation (5) while equations (6) to (8) show the mass balance and topological constraints. Min j wj F (5) Fwj + Fi, j - F j,k - F j,out = 0 (6) Fi, j (Ci out max , - Cj in max , ) - Fwj Cj in max , 0 (7) aij = N (8) where 1 if Fij rij > 0 aij = 0 if Fij rij = 0 Figure 4 shows that while three PSO variations result to satisfactory solutions, a-PSO and -PSO converge faster and provide quality solutions complying with the constraints. Figure 4: Comparison of results using a-PSO (A), PSO (B) and -PSO (C) 80 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 No. of iterations Water Budget A B C 50 20 70 60 D1 D4 D3 D2 S1 S2 S3 S4 100 50 70.
format text
author Col-long, Kristine Joy
author_facet Col-long, Kristine Joy
author_sort Col-long, Kristine Joy
title Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
title_short Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
title_full Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
title_fullStr Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
title_full_unstemmed Improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
title_sort improved particle swarm optimizers with adaptive leadership features and their application in process water integration
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2006
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/3441
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/10279/viewcontent/CDTG004182_P__1_.pdf
_version_ 1778174573185859584