Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981

This study was undertaken to survey the teaching effectiveness in some CICM schools, as perceived by CICM supervisors for the school year 1980-1981. The following questions were specifically raised by the problem: 1) What is the evaluation of each and all eight areas (the classroom, teacher, objecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Puapo, Asuncion
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 1981
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/4187
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-11025
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-110252021-01-07T17:07:15Z Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981 Puapo, Asuncion This study was undertaken to survey the teaching effectiveness in some CICM schools, as perceived by CICM supervisors for the school year 1980-1981. The following questions were specifically raised by the problem: 1) What is the evaluation of each and all eight areas (the classroom, teacher, objectives, content, teaching procedure, medium of instruction, instrumental tools and students) of the supervisory report? 2) What are the strength and weaknesses in each and all eight sub-areas of the supervisory report? 3) What are the implications of the study to the CICM educational service? The documents, used to furnish pertinent data, are the supervisory reports and the enrollment data for the school year 1980-1981. Five descriptive values with the corresponding numerical values were used to evaluate the reports. Then, the average rate for the item, the average of each of the eight areas and overall average were taken. Based on the data gathered, the findings of the study show that: 1) The overall average of the teachers is 3.23 or good. That means all areas are open for improvement. 2) Of the eight areas, students have the lowest average. This needs more attention in the future. 3) In each of the seven areas in the summary, there are particular items that had been rated with an average in the line of 2 items with high entries under fair, poor, or zero. All in all, there are nineteen items out of forty four that have less need to be in the supervisory report. 1981-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/4187 Master's Theses English Animo Repository Effective teaching
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Effective teaching
spellingShingle Effective teaching
Puapo, Asuncion
Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
description This study was undertaken to survey the teaching effectiveness in some CICM schools, as perceived by CICM supervisors for the school year 1980-1981. The following questions were specifically raised by the problem: 1) What is the evaluation of each and all eight areas (the classroom, teacher, objectives, content, teaching procedure, medium of instruction, instrumental tools and students) of the supervisory report? 2) What are the strength and weaknesses in each and all eight sub-areas of the supervisory report? 3) What are the implications of the study to the CICM educational service? The documents, used to furnish pertinent data, are the supervisory reports and the enrollment data for the school year 1980-1981. Five descriptive values with the corresponding numerical values were used to evaluate the reports. Then, the average rate for the item, the average of each of the eight areas and overall average were taken. Based on the data gathered, the findings of the study show that: 1) The overall average of the teachers is 3.23 or good. That means all areas are open for improvement. 2) Of the eight areas, students have the lowest average. This needs more attention in the future. 3) In each of the seven areas in the summary, there are particular items that had been rated with an average in the line of 2 items with high entries under fair, poor, or zero. All in all, there are nineteen items out of forty four that have less need to be in the supervisory report.
format text
author Puapo, Asuncion
author_facet Puapo, Asuncion
author_sort Puapo, Asuncion
title Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
title_short Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
title_full Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
title_fullStr Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
title_full_unstemmed Survey of supervisory reports in CICM schools for the school year 1980-1981
title_sort survey of supervisory reports in cicm schools for the school year 1980-1981
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 1981
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/4187
_version_ 1712575245951434752