Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila

Metropolitan Manila, the capital region of the Philippines, is composed of 16 cities and a municipality. Currently, Metro Manila has four urban and commuter rail systems, LRT 1, LRT 2, MRT 3, and the Philippine National Railway (PNR). In addition to these rail systems, there are also road based tran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ting, Sean Johnlee Q.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5139
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-11977
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-119772024-05-11T05:56:11Z Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila Ting, Sean Johnlee Q. Metropolitan Manila, the capital region of the Philippines, is composed of 16 cities and a municipality. Currently, Metro Manila has four urban and commuter rail systems, LRT 1, LRT 2, MRT 3, and the Philippine National Railway (PNR). In addition to these rail systems, there are also road based transit, provided by public utility jeepneys (PUJ), public utility buses (PUB), and Asian utility vehicles (AUV), or commonly known as FX. The known demand of public transportation from the Metro Manila Urban Transportation Integration Study Update and Capacity Enhancement Project (2012) study is the updated trips generated and trips attracted per traffic analysis zone (TAZ) in Metro Manila and neighboring provinces. However, changes in socioeconomic and land use data will also change the demand for public transportation. Therefore public transportation demand models were developed using two approaches, multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). Results show that ANN models were far better in terms of fit than MLR models. Bus demand from the bus questionnaire survey was then compared to MUCEP bus data. Results show that the data from survey and MUCEP has small difference in terms of the percent share per city. Future forecast of demand per public transport mode for the year 2020, 2025, and 2030 were also executed using both ANN and MLR models. Recommendations include a better and more accurate socioeconomic data from the local government and a better system of survey using technologies and softwares in order to have faster data processing and analysis. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5139 Master's Theses English Animo Repository Transportation engineering--Philippines--Metro Manila Civil Engineering
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Transportation engineering--Philippines--Metro Manila
Civil Engineering
spellingShingle Transportation engineering--Philippines--Metro Manila
Civil Engineering
Ting, Sean Johnlee Q.
Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
description Metropolitan Manila, the capital region of the Philippines, is composed of 16 cities and a municipality. Currently, Metro Manila has four urban and commuter rail systems, LRT 1, LRT 2, MRT 3, and the Philippine National Railway (PNR). In addition to these rail systems, there are also road based transit, provided by public utility jeepneys (PUJ), public utility buses (PUB), and Asian utility vehicles (AUV), or commonly known as FX. The known demand of public transportation from the Metro Manila Urban Transportation Integration Study Update and Capacity Enhancement Project (2012) study is the updated trips generated and trips attracted per traffic analysis zone (TAZ) in Metro Manila and neighboring provinces. However, changes in socioeconomic and land use data will also change the demand for public transportation. Therefore public transportation demand models were developed using two approaches, multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). Results show that ANN models were far better in terms of fit than MLR models. Bus demand from the bus questionnaire survey was then compared to MUCEP bus data. Results show that the data from survey and MUCEP has small difference in terms of the percent share per city. Future forecast of demand per public transport mode for the year 2020, 2025, and 2030 were also executed using both ANN and MLR models. Recommendations include a better and more accurate socioeconomic data from the local government and a better system of survey using technologies and softwares in order to have faster data processing and analysis.
format text
author Ting, Sean Johnlee Q.
author_facet Ting, Sean Johnlee Q.
author_sort Ting, Sean Johnlee Q.
title Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
title_short Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
title_full Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
title_fullStr Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
title_full_unstemmed Public transport demand modeling for Metro Manila
title_sort public transport demand modeling for metro manila
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2015
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5139
_version_ 1800918838224617472