Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia

Conflict resolution determines the phenomenon of peace as merely the absence of war, and vice versa. This axiomatic determinism is problematic on many fronts as peace and conflict, though two sides of the same coin are nebulously complex. This basic assumption has revolved around International Relat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5849
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12688&context=etd_masteral
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-12688
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-126882021-04-16T00:39:16Z Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N. Conflict resolution determines the phenomenon of peace as merely the absence of war, and vice versa. This axiomatic determinism is problematic on many fronts as peace and conflict, though two sides of the same coin are nebulously complex. This basic assumption has revolved around International Relations’ aim at positivism. Peace research (or peace study) recalibrates its approach by shifting its focus to the non-war research agenda but still maintains similar materialism as conflict resolution. A careful examination of extant literature suggests three deficiencies. First, the materialistic conception of peace and conflict has dominated the discipline, and this impedes a nuanced picture of peace. Second, there is little focus on ideational elements of peace such as speech, utterances, meanings, and actions. Lastly, there is little literature on the study of peace in East Asia. To remedy this, this peace study proposes the use of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative action as an alternative to peace study frameworks and the prevailing conflict resolution paradigms as it offers an ideational account of conflict actors’ speech, utterances, meanings, and actions. The study employs discourse analysis along the contours of communicative action theory to argue that the actors’ rationalization of conflict and their respective response to the said conflict will yield a nuanced picture of peace stability in East Asia. The study looks at the communicative interactions between that of Taiwan and China (Cross-Straits) and that of North Korea and South Korea (the Korean Peninsula). 2020-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5849 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12688&context=etd_masteral Master's Theses English Animo Repository Peace Conflict management--East Asia Peace-building--East Asia Discourse analysis East Asian Languages and Societies
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Peace
Conflict management--East Asia
Peace-building--East Asia
Discourse analysis
East Asian Languages and Societies
spellingShingle Peace
Conflict management--East Asia
Peace-building--East Asia
Discourse analysis
East Asian Languages and Societies
Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N.
Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
description Conflict resolution determines the phenomenon of peace as merely the absence of war, and vice versa. This axiomatic determinism is problematic on many fronts as peace and conflict, though two sides of the same coin are nebulously complex. This basic assumption has revolved around International Relations’ aim at positivism. Peace research (or peace study) recalibrates its approach by shifting its focus to the non-war research agenda but still maintains similar materialism as conflict resolution. A careful examination of extant literature suggests three deficiencies. First, the materialistic conception of peace and conflict has dominated the discipline, and this impedes a nuanced picture of peace. Second, there is little focus on ideational elements of peace such as speech, utterances, meanings, and actions. Lastly, there is little literature on the study of peace in East Asia. To remedy this, this peace study proposes the use of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of communicative action as an alternative to peace study frameworks and the prevailing conflict resolution paradigms as it offers an ideational account of conflict actors’ speech, utterances, meanings, and actions. The study employs discourse analysis along the contours of communicative action theory to argue that the actors’ rationalization of conflict and their respective response to the said conflict will yield a nuanced picture of peace stability in East Asia. The study looks at the communicative interactions between that of Taiwan and China (Cross-Straits) and that of North Korea and South Korea (the Korean Peninsula).
format text
author Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N.
author_facet Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N.
author_sort Baladjay, Deryk Matthew N.
title Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
title_short Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
title_full Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
title_fullStr Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
title_full_unstemmed Re-imagining peace models: Communicative action and the peace study of East Asia
title_sort re-imagining peace models: communicative action and the peace study of east asia
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5849
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12688&context=etd_masteral
_version_ 1712576336709550080