Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health

Republic Act No. 9334 did not update the four‐tiered excise tax classification table for machine‐packed cigarettes that was originally drawn up by Republic Act No. 8240 in 1996. The 1996 four‐tiered excise tax classification table is now outdated because it has largely been eroded by inflation over...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Punzalan, Enjil D.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6492
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/12984/viewcontent/CDTG004539_P.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-12984
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-129842022-11-12T01:48:10Z Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health Punzalan, Enjil D. Republic Act No. 9334 did not update the four‐tiered excise tax classification table for machine‐packed cigarettes that was originally drawn up by Republic Act No. 8240 in 1996. The 1996 four‐tiered excise tax classification table is now outdated because it has largely been eroded by inflation over a period of more than 10 years. If a New Brand were to be introduced in the market today, such new brand must be introduced at a net retail price of (1) below P5.00 per pack of 20’s to be classified at the low‐priced segment; and (2) no more than P6.50 per pack to be classified at the mid‐priced segment; and (3) no more than P10.00 to be classified at the high‐priced segment. If such new brand is introduced at existing price levels, it would be classified at the premium‐priced segment because the four‐tiered excise tax classification table is based on 1996 price levels. In short, a manufacturer or importer of a new brand entering the market today would have to bear significant losses as an inevitable result of coming in at price levels of more than 10 years ago. In effect, the cigarette excise tax system acts as a barrier to New Brands planning to enter the market. The Philippines is one of highest consumer market of these vice products, consequently, one major cause of deaths in the country comes from the effects of cigarette usage. Not one but several diseases caused by smoking and second‐hand smoking as well, have led to deaths and physical sufferings of most Filipino’s, this is an established fact. Moreover, government has subsidized many ill‐related causes among Filipino’s especially the poor and the taxes obtained from manufacturers are critically insufficient to answer the needs of the people. 2009-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6492 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/12984/viewcontent/CDTG004539_P.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository Excise tax—Law and legislation—Philippines Cigarettes—Taxation—Law and legislation—Philippines Cigarettes—Taxation—Philippines Taxation Tax Law
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Excise tax—Law and legislation—Philippines
Cigarettes—Taxation—Law and legislation—Philippines
Cigarettes—Taxation—Philippines
Taxation
Tax Law
spellingShingle Excise tax—Law and legislation—Philippines
Cigarettes—Taxation—Law and legislation—Philippines
Cigarettes—Taxation—Philippines
Taxation
Tax Law
Punzalan, Enjil D.
Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
description Republic Act No. 9334 did not update the four‐tiered excise tax classification table for machine‐packed cigarettes that was originally drawn up by Republic Act No. 8240 in 1996. The 1996 four‐tiered excise tax classification table is now outdated because it has largely been eroded by inflation over a period of more than 10 years. If a New Brand were to be introduced in the market today, such new brand must be introduced at a net retail price of (1) below P5.00 per pack of 20’s to be classified at the low‐priced segment; and (2) no more than P6.50 per pack to be classified at the mid‐priced segment; and (3) no more than P10.00 to be classified at the high‐priced segment. If such new brand is introduced at existing price levels, it would be classified at the premium‐priced segment because the four‐tiered excise tax classification table is based on 1996 price levels. In short, a manufacturer or importer of a new brand entering the market today would have to bear significant losses as an inevitable result of coming in at price levels of more than 10 years ago. In effect, the cigarette excise tax system acts as a barrier to New Brands planning to enter the market. The Philippines is one of highest consumer market of these vice products, consequently, one major cause of deaths in the country comes from the effects of cigarette usage. Not one but several diseases caused by smoking and second‐hand smoking as well, have led to deaths and physical sufferings of most Filipino’s, this is an established fact. Moreover, government has subsidized many ill‐related causes among Filipino’s especially the poor and the taxes obtained from manufacturers are critically insufficient to answer the needs of the people.
format text
author Punzalan, Enjil D.
author_facet Punzalan, Enjil D.
author_sort Punzalan, Enjil D.
title Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
title_short Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
title_full Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
title_fullStr Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
title_full_unstemmed Proposal to revisit section-145[C] of the NIRC: Non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
title_sort proposal to revisit section-145[c] of the nirc: non-uniformity on the imposition excise taxes and violation of the state's duty to promote health
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2009
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6492
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/12984/viewcontent/CDTG004539_P.pdf
_version_ 1767196337632182272