Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis

The purpose of this action research is to provide an enhancement to an existing EPPM Dashboard. Through collaborative intervention, it was determined that the specific enhancement needed is Automation of Project Documentation Quality Assurance. This addresses the issue of the bank wherein the status...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elinzano, Gerand Boy O.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6156
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13248/viewcontent/ELINZANO_GERANDBOY_edited.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-13248
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-132482022-08-04T05:55:31Z Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis Elinzano, Gerand Boy O. The purpose of this action research is to provide an enhancement to an existing EPPM Dashboard. Through collaborative intervention, it was determined that the specific enhancement needed is Automation of Project Documentation Quality Assurance. This addresses the issue of the bank wherein the status of the Project Documentation Quality Assurance is unknown1. However, aside from software development, it was also found that user behavioral analysis is also required to address the issue. The first cycle focuses on building software that automates the Project Documentation QA. In the first cycle, the issue was constructed in collaboration with the different levels in the organization – working, middle management, and executives. The method of data gathering was done through meetings and consultation with different units. The first cycle further challenges the Scrum Framework wherein the prioritization is determined by the Product Owner alone. The second cycle focuses on addressing an issue that came from the first cycle through User Behavioral Analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model. The researchers determined the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the software that was developed. From the data gathering, appropriate action was conducted to address the issue. 2020-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6156 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13248/viewcontent/ELINZANO_GERANDBOY_edited.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository Dashboards (Management information systems) Management Information Systems
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Dashboards (Management information systems)
Management Information Systems
spellingShingle Dashboards (Management information systems)
Management Information Systems
Elinzano, Gerand Boy O.
Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
description The purpose of this action research is to provide an enhancement to an existing EPPM Dashboard. Through collaborative intervention, it was determined that the specific enhancement needed is Automation of Project Documentation Quality Assurance. This addresses the issue of the bank wherein the status of the Project Documentation Quality Assurance is unknown1. However, aside from software development, it was also found that user behavioral analysis is also required to address the issue. The first cycle focuses on building software that automates the Project Documentation QA. In the first cycle, the issue was constructed in collaboration with the different levels in the organization – working, middle management, and executives. The method of data gathering was done through meetings and consultation with different units. The first cycle further challenges the Scrum Framework wherein the prioritization is determined by the Product Owner alone. The second cycle focuses on addressing an issue that came from the first cycle through User Behavioral Analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model. The researchers determined the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of the software that was developed. From the data gathering, appropriate action was conducted to address the issue.
format text
author Elinzano, Gerand Boy O.
author_facet Elinzano, Gerand Boy O.
author_sort Elinzano, Gerand Boy O.
title Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
title_short Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
title_full Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
title_fullStr Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
title_sort determining the status of project documentation quality assurance through automation and user behavioral analysis
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6156
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13248/viewcontent/ELINZANO_GERANDBOY_edited.pdf
_version_ 1772835791471378432