Writ of kalikasan: Protection for all?
The author seeks to prove that the “two (2) city or province affected ”requirement of the Writ of Kalikasan is unconstitutional, because it violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution. Equal protection requires that persons similarly situated must be treated alike, the only exception is...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Chiongson, Sharlene Anjelica L. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6378 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13443/viewcontent/11087897_CHIONGSON_THESIS2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Legal framework on protected areas: Philippines
by: La Viña, Antonio Gabriel M., et al.
Published: (2010) -
Pagkakaingin: Isang pagsuway sa batas kalikasan o teka! Kanino?
by: De Guzman, Billy N.
Published: (2022) -
Protecting the hidden gem of the South: Lobo, Batangas of the Philippines
by: Garan, Lisa Marie A., et al.
Published: (2020) -
Disputed questions on the writ of habeas data
by: Tolentino, Mark Kristopher G.
Published: (2009) -
After more than 100 years of environmental law, what's next for the Philippines?
by: La Viña, Antonio Gabriel M., et al.
Published: (2014)