(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009
In 2008, Republic Act No. 9513 or the Renewable Energy Act was passed with the purpose of exploring and utilizing renewable energy to achieve energy self-reliance. As an incentive, the law provided for a Feed-in Tariff scheme to jumpstart investments in the sector. In 2013, the Department of Energy...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6536 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13541/viewcontent/_GERICOLCOL__THESIS2.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Language: | English |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-13541 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-135412023-06-21T07:46:09Z (Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 Ricolcol, Gabrielle E. In 2008, Republic Act No. 9513 or the Renewable Energy Act was passed with the purpose of exploring and utilizing renewable energy to achieve energy self-reliance. As an incentive, the law provided for a Feed-in Tariff scheme to jumpstart investments in the sector. In 2013, the Department of Energy introduced a first-come-first-serve policy through DOE Circular 2013-05-0009 in order to weed out speculators. This paper discusses the unconstitutionality of the first-come-first-serve policy due to being violative of the equal protection clause. Several possible solutions are also discussed, with a finding that the policy must be removed for the growth and development of the renewable energy sector. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6536 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13541/viewcontent/_GERICOLCOL__THESIS2.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository Renewable energy sources—Law and legislation—Philippines Clean energy industries—Philippines—Finance Clean energy investment—Philippines Energy and Utilities Law |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
language |
English |
topic |
Renewable energy sources—Law and legislation—Philippines Clean energy industries—Philippines—Finance Clean energy investment—Philippines Energy and Utilities Law |
spellingShingle |
Renewable energy sources—Law and legislation—Philippines Clean energy industries—Philippines—Finance Clean energy investment—Philippines Energy and Utilities Law Ricolcol, Gabrielle E. (Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
description |
In 2008, Republic Act No. 9513 or the Renewable Energy Act was passed with the purpose of exploring and utilizing renewable energy to achieve energy self-reliance. As an incentive, the law provided for a Feed-in Tariff scheme to jumpstart investments in the sector. In 2013, the Department of Energy introduced a first-come-first-serve policy through DOE Circular 2013-05-0009 in order to weed out speculators.
This paper discusses the unconstitutionality of the first-come-first-serve policy due to being violative of the equal protection clause. Several possible solutions are also discussed, with a finding that the policy must be removed for the growth and development of the renewable energy sector. |
format |
text |
author |
Ricolcol, Gabrielle E. |
author_facet |
Ricolcol, Gabrielle E. |
author_sort |
Ricolcol, Gabrielle E. |
title |
(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
title_short |
(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
title_full |
(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
title_fullStr |
(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
title_full_unstemmed |
(Un)fit: The unconstitutionality of DOE circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
title_sort |
(un)fit: the unconstitutionality of doe circular no. 2013-05-0009 |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6536 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13541/viewcontent/_GERICOLCOL__THESIS2.pdf |
_version_ |
1769841937700880384 |