An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86

This study is a summative evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance. The question intended to be answered was: How effective is the delivery system of guidance services as implemented by the grantee guidance counselors? The specific questions intended to be answ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Llanes, Rosa Maria I.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/1489
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-8327
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-83272021-01-21T04:22:23Z An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86 Llanes, Rosa Maria I. This study is a summative evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance. The question intended to be answered was: How effective is the delivery system of guidance services as implemented by the grantee guidance counselors? The specific questions intended to be answered by this study were (a) adequacy of the counselor-training program, (b) effectiveness of the guidance services as perceived by the students, faculty and administrators and (c) adequacy of the grantees in the delivery of guidance services. This study used the descriptive method of research. Five questionnaires were fielded to the following respondents: (1) host institution, (2) administrator, (3) faculty, (4) grantee, and (5) student. Mean ratings and percentages were computed. The results are as follows. The screening scheme and grantee preparedness for the program were rated as very satisfactory. The financial grant from CEM was appraised as very satisfactory while that from the grantee school, satisfactory. The three host schools used, namely: (a) De La Salle University, (b) University of San Carlos and (c) Ateneo de Davao were assessed on several factors. The following factors were all rated as very satisfactory, namely: (a) physical plant and facilities, (b) library resources, (c) personnel, and (d) teacher-student ratio. The performance of the professors was rated as excellent. The curriculum was rated as very satisfactory. The core subjects, cognates and practicum were all very satisfactory. The most difficult subjects were Testing, Research and Techniques of Counseling, while the easiest were the cognates. The most relevant was Organization of Guidance Services and the least relevant was the thesis. The most useful subject was Techniques of Counseling and the least useful was the thesis. The CEM member schools have been rated as having very satisfactory organizational set-ups in their guidance offices. The physical facilities were rated as very satisfactory as to adequacy and accessibility. A counseling room was provided as claimed by 91 percent of the respondents. The grantee/guidance counselors were rated as very satisfactory in terms of competence. The ratio of guidance counselors to students was 1:1129. The teachers as partners in the guidance program implementation also performed their role at a satisfactory level though slightly lower than their role awareness level which was very satisfactory. The administrative support was reported as very satisfactory. The aspects which were rated as very satisfactory were the following: (a) selection of grantees, (b) orientation of grantees, (c) coordination among the CEM, host schools, CEM member schools, (d) preparation of grantees for the practicum, and (e) evaluation of student achievement. Two areas received satisfactory ratings: (a) orientation of grantees and host schools on the program and (b) practicum supervision. In terms of effectiveness of the delivery of services, the ranking was as follows: (a) placement, (b) inventory, (c) follow-up, (d) testing, (e) counseling, (f) referral, (g) research, and (h) information. The first five services obtained very satisfactory ratings while the last three got satisfactory ratings. Guidance program dissemination was carried satisfactorily through: (a) orientation, (b) posters, and (c) school newspapers with the help of the guidance counselors, teachers, and school heads. 1988-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/1489 Master's Theses English Animo Repository Personnel service in education Educational program Education Higher Educational guidance Curriculum and Instruction Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Teacher Education and Professional Development
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Personnel service in education
Educational program
Education
Higher
Educational guidance
Curriculum and Instruction
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Teacher Education and Professional Development
spellingShingle Personnel service in education
Educational program
Education
Higher
Educational guidance
Curriculum and Instruction
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Teacher Education and Professional Development
Llanes, Rosa Maria I.
An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
description This study is a summative evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance. The question intended to be answered was: How effective is the delivery system of guidance services as implemented by the grantee guidance counselors? The specific questions intended to be answered by this study were (a) adequacy of the counselor-training program, (b) effectiveness of the guidance services as perceived by the students, faculty and administrators and (c) adequacy of the grantees in the delivery of guidance services. This study used the descriptive method of research. Five questionnaires were fielded to the following respondents: (1) host institution, (2) administrator, (3) faculty, (4) grantee, and (5) student. Mean ratings and percentages were computed. The results are as follows. The screening scheme and grantee preparedness for the program were rated as very satisfactory. The financial grant from CEM was appraised as very satisfactory while that from the grantee school, satisfactory. The three host schools used, namely: (a) De La Salle University, (b) University of San Carlos and (c) Ateneo de Davao were assessed on several factors. The following factors were all rated as very satisfactory, namely: (a) physical plant and facilities, (b) library resources, (c) personnel, and (d) teacher-student ratio. The performance of the professors was rated as excellent. The curriculum was rated as very satisfactory. The core subjects, cognates and practicum were all very satisfactory. The most difficult subjects were Testing, Research and Techniques of Counseling, while the easiest were the cognates. The most relevant was Organization of Guidance Services and the least relevant was the thesis. The most useful subject was Techniques of Counseling and the least useful was the thesis. The CEM member schools have been rated as having very satisfactory organizational set-ups in their guidance offices. The physical facilities were rated as very satisfactory as to adequacy and accessibility. A counseling room was provided as claimed by 91 percent of the respondents. The grantee/guidance counselors were rated as very satisfactory in terms of competence. The ratio of guidance counselors to students was 1:1129. The teachers as partners in the guidance program implementation also performed their role at a satisfactory level though slightly lower than their role awareness level which was very satisfactory. The administrative support was reported as very satisfactory. The aspects which were rated as very satisfactory were the following: (a) selection of grantees, (b) orientation of grantees, (c) coordination among the CEM, host schools, CEM member schools, (d) preparation of grantees for the practicum, and (e) evaluation of student achievement. Two areas received satisfactory ratings: (a) orientation of grantees and host schools on the program and (b) practicum supervision. In terms of effectiveness of the delivery of services, the ranking was as follows: (a) placement, (b) inventory, (c) follow-up, (d) testing, (e) counseling, (f) referral, (g) research, and (h) information. The first five services obtained very satisfactory ratings while the last three got satisfactory ratings. Guidance program dissemination was carried satisfactorily through: (a) orientation, (b) posters, and (c) school newspapers with the help of the guidance counselors, teachers, and school heads.
format text
author Llanes, Rosa Maria I.
author_facet Llanes, Rosa Maria I.
author_sort Llanes, Rosa Maria I.
title An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
title_short An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
title_full An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
title_fullStr An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the Center for Educational Measurement Degree Program in Guidance, 1983-86
title_sort evaluation of the center for educational measurement degree program in guidance, 1983-86
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 1988
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/1489
_version_ 1712574934972104704