A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines

The assessment of the protected area management effectiveness (PAME) in the Philippines is through the use of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). There have been observed gaps in using the METT since its development in 2001 (METT 1 in 2001, METT 2 in 2005; and METT 3 in 2007) and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grate, Fatima G.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_bio/26
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etdm_bio/article/1028/viewcontent/2023_Grate_A_comparative_study_of_Management_Effectiveness_Tracking_Tool_Full_text.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etdm_bio-1028
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etdm_bio-10282023-12-12T23:56:27Z A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines Grate, Fatima G. The assessment of the protected area management effectiveness (PAME) in the Philippines is through the use of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). There have been observed gaps in using the METT since its development in 2001 (METT 1 in 2001, METT 2 in 2005; and METT 3 in 2007) and the METT 3 version is still the one in use up to this day, therefore, this study intends to compare the old (METT 3) and new METT version (METT 4). This study proposes the adoption of METT 4 in the PAME assessments in the country as it addresses the gaps and challenges encountered in the use of METT 3, through the review of literature and experiences of the implementers of PAME assessment in the Philippines. Several developments in METT 4 were observed in terms of the number and order of questions, inclusion of indicators that dig deeper into threats, as well as the aspect of biodiversity outcomes, condition of values, and climate change, which were mostly not given importance in METT 3. There have also been several criticisms reported by the PAME assessors in the use of METT 3 in terms of the knowledge of people involved in the assessment process, and the generation of data through the required means of verifications (MOVs). Developments in METT 4 were also discussed in this paper. Considering these observations, it is recommended that the DENR update its guidelines and PA programs as our country progresses toward a more effective PAME assessment through the adoption of METT 4. 2023-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_bio/26 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etdm_bio/article/1028/viewcontent/2023_Grate_A_comparative_study_of_Management_Effectiveness_Tracking_Tool_Full_text.pdf Biology Master's Theses English Animo Repository Protected areas--Philippines Biodiversity—Climatic factors Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool Biology Environmental Sciences
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Protected areas--Philippines
Biodiversity—Climatic factors
Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool
Biology
Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle Protected areas--Philippines
Biodiversity—Climatic factors
Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool
Biology
Environmental Sciences
Grate, Fatima G.
A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
description The assessment of the protected area management effectiveness (PAME) in the Philippines is through the use of the Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (METT). There have been observed gaps in using the METT since its development in 2001 (METT 1 in 2001, METT 2 in 2005; and METT 3 in 2007) and the METT 3 version is still the one in use up to this day, therefore, this study intends to compare the old (METT 3) and new METT version (METT 4). This study proposes the adoption of METT 4 in the PAME assessments in the country as it addresses the gaps and challenges encountered in the use of METT 3, through the review of literature and experiences of the implementers of PAME assessment in the Philippines. Several developments in METT 4 were observed in terms of the number and order of questions, inclusion of indicators that dig deeper into threats, as well as the aspect of biodiversity outcomes, condition of values, and climate change, which were mostly not given importance in METT 3. There have also been several criticisms reported by the PAME assessors in the use of METT 3 in terms of the knowledge of people involved in the assessment process, and the generation of data through the required means of verifications (MOVs). Developments in METT 4 were also discussed in this paper. Considering these observations, it is recommended that the DENR update its guidelines and PA programs as our country progresses toward a more effective PAME assessment through the adoption of METT 4.
format text
author Grate, Fatima G.
author_facet Grate, Fatima G.
author_sort Grate, Fatima G.
title A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
title_short A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
title_full A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
title_fullStr A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (METT) 3 and METT 4 for protected area management effectiveness (PAME) assessment in the Philippines
title_sort comparative study of management effectiveness tracking tool (mett) 3 and mett 4 for protected area management effectiveness (pame) assessment in the philippines
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2023
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_bio/26
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etdm_bio/article/1028/viewcontent/2023_Grate_A_comparative_study_of_Management_Effectiveness_Tracking_Tool_Full_text.pdf
_version_ 1787155617043972096