Relativistic corrections to MOND from extended metric gravity theory with dimensionless scalar curvature

• Main Author: Cruz, Donniel C.
• Format: text
• Language: English
• Published: Animo Repository 2021
• Subjects: Gravity; Newtonian fluids; Weak interactions (Nuclear physics); Scalar field theory; Riemannian manifolds; Physics
• Online Access: https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etdm_physics/3; https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etdm_physics/article/1000/viewcontent/2021_Cruz_Donniel_Partial.pdf
• Institution: De La Salle University

This study derives the relativistic corrections to the MOND acceleration law by solving the 𝑓(χ) field equations proposed by Bernal et. al., with the choice 𝑓(χ)=χ^3/2, and where χ is a dimensionless scalar curvature. A metric ansatz involving a radial correction function 𝜔(𝑟) is constructed for a spherically symmetric, static spacetime. Non-relativistic MOND coincides with Newtonian gravity at a radial distance 𝑟=𝑙_𝑚=(𝐺𝑀/𝑎_0)^1/2 from the central mass 𝑀; this defines a transition radius between the two theories. Extending this to the relativistic case, the Schwarzschild solution is used as a boundary condition at this transition point. The field equations provide two first order differential equations of the correction function ω(𝑟). To first order in 1/𝑐, the two equations agree on a solution. At this level of approximation, the purely spatial components of the metric solution are equivalent to those of the Schwarzschild metric. The correction implies that the relativistic orbital speed of test bodies about a central mass is lower than the non-relativistic predictions; the correction vanishes for 𝑟≫𝑙_𝑚. This study also derives the correction function for null geodesics in the MOND case; it shows that lensing and scattering effects are stronger than what general relativity predicts for 𝑟>𝑙_𝑚. To second order in 1/𝑐, the two differential equations of ω(𝑟) have different solutions; the theory does not provide any mechanism or criteria to identify which solution applies to a given situation. This anomalous dichotomy points to the possibility that either higher order approximations are required, or that there are extra assumptions that are currently beyond the theory at hand. Up to leading order, the metric solution in this study agrees with the perturbative solutions by Mendoza et. al., and Bernal et. al. Using variational techniques, this study derives the generalized field equations of metric 𝑓(χ) gravity; the variation involves a non-vanishing boundary term. This paper proves that a non-dynamical, Gibbons-Hawking-York type boundary counter-term similar to the one used in 𝑓(𝑅) gravity can be used to construct a more complete action for this theory.