A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy

Quito published her book The State of Philosophy in the Philippines in 1983. When the book was already out for fifteen years, I undertook a re-reading of its identified four clusters of reasons for the underdevelopment of Filipino philosophy, and hope for development in 1999, through an article “Re-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/427
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-1426
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-14262021-12-16T06:15:46Z A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III Quito published her book The State of Philosophy in the Philippines in 1983. When the book was already out for fifteen years, I undertook a re-reading of its identified four clusters of reasons for the underdevelopment of Filipino philosophy, and hope for development in 1999, through an article “Re-Reading Emerita Quito's Thoughts Concerning the Underdevelopment of Filipino Philosophy.” Thirty-six years after the publication of Quito's book, and twenty years after the publication of my re-reading, this paper looks back again on Quito's four clusters of reasons and hope, as well as on my re-reading of such reasons and hope, with the intention of sharpening our collective diagnosis on what continue to cause the underdevelopment of Filipino philosophy, as well as imagining more realistic pathways towards its more robust development. This paper, therefore, has two substantive sections: the first is an exposition of Quito's four clusters of causes and hope, accompanied by my commentaries on such four causes and hope; and the second is my present critical reflection on Quito's thirty-four-year-old diagnosis and hope, as well as on my twenty-year-old commentary. © 2020 Philippine National Philosophical Research Society. All rights reserved. 2020-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/427 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Philosophy, Philippine Philosophy
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Philosophy, Philippine
Philosophy
spellingShingle Philosophy, Philippine
Philosophy
Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III
A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
description Quito published her book The State of Philosophy in the Philippines in 1983. When the book was already out for fifteen years, I undertook a re-reading of its identified four clusters of reasons for the underdevelopment of Filipino philosophy, and hope for development in 1999, through an article “Re-Reading Emerita Quito's Thoughts Concerning the Underdevelopment of Filipino Philosophy.” Thirty-six years after the publication of Quito's book, and twenty years after the publication of my re-reading, this paper looks back again on Quito's four clusters of reasons and hope, as well as on my re-reading of such reasons and hope, with the intention of sharpening our collective diagnosis on what continue to cause the underdevelopment of Filipino philosophy, as well as imagining more realistic pathways towards its more robust development. This paper, therefore, has two substantive sections: the first is an exposition of Quito's four clusters of causes and hope, accompanied by my commentaries on such four causes and hope; and the second is my present critical reflection on Quito's thirty-four-year-old diagnosis and hope, as well as on my twenty-year-old commentary. © 2020 Philippine National Philosophical Research Society. All rights reserved.
format text
author Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III
author_facet Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III
author_sort Demeterio, Feorillo Petronilo A., III
title A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
title_short A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
title_full A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
title_fullStr A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
title_full_unstemmed A critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of Emerita Quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of Filipino philosophy
title_sort critical reflection on my reading and re-reading of emerita quito's thoughts on the underdevelopment and hope for the development of filipino philosophy
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/427
_version_ 1720527966988926976