The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization

The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teehankee, Julio C., Kasuya, Yuko
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/457
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-1456
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-14562021-12-09T00:09:39Z The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization Teehankee, Julio C. Kasuya, Yuko The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself. © The Author(s) 2019. 2020-03-01T08:00:00Z text text/html https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/457 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Elections--Philippines Philippines—Politics and government—1986- Rodrigo Roa Duterte, 1945 Populism-Philippines Political Science
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Elections--Philippines
Philippines—Politics and government—1986-
Rodrigo Roa Duterte, 1945
Populism-Philippines
Political Science
spellingShingle Elections--Philippines
Philippines—Politics and government—1986-
Rodrigo Roa Duterte, 1945
Populism-Philippines
Political Science
Teehankee, Julio C.
Kasuya, Yuko
The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
description The May 13, 2019 midterm elections were generally seen as a referendum on the first three years of the presidency of Rodrigo R Duterte. The elections tested and consolidated the political strength of Duterte as the country’s populist strongman president. Most of the national and local candidates he endorsed won their contests for the 18,066 national and local positions. The election also resulted in a victory for the administration’s nine senatorial candidates (out of 12 seats) and a majority of its governors, mayors, and local legislators. The results follow the historical patterns of midterm elections in the post-authoritarian period. But unlike previous Philippine presidents, Duterte did not personally endeavor to consolidate his political support under his dominant party solely through the systematic mobilization of patronage. Duterte eschewed patronage-based political party building in favor of populist mobilization or the rallying of mass supporters toward contentious political action with minimum institutional intermediation. With a record high trust rating, Duterte was not only an active endorser of candidates, but he was also both a staunch defender of his allies and a relentless attacker of the opposition. In the end, the biggest winners in the 2019 midterm elections were not the candidates but Duterte himself. © The Author(s) 2019.
format text
author Teehankee, Julio C.
Kasuya, Yuko
author_facet Teehankee, Julio C.
Kasuya, Yuko
author_sort Teehankee, Julio C.
title The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
title_short The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
title_full The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
title_fullStr The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
title_full_unstemmed The 2019 midterm elections in the Philippines: Party system pathologies and Duterte’s populist mobilization
title_sort 2019 midterm elections in the philippines: party system pathologies and duterte’s populist mobilization
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/457
_version_ 1719000540915957760