Cultural differences in implicit theories and self-perceptions of traitedness: Replication and extension with alternative measurement formats and cultural dimensions

• Main Authors: Church, A. Timothy, Willmore, Stephanie L., Anderson, Adisa T., Ochiai, Masayuki, Porter, Noriko, Mateo, Niño Jose, Reyes, Jose Alberto S., Vargas-Flores, José De Jesus, Reyes, Joselina Ibanez, Alvarez, Juan M., Katigbak, Marcia S., Ortiz, Fernando A.
• Format: text
• Published: Animo Repository 2012
• Online Access: https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/884; https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/1883/type/native/viewcontent
• Institution: De La Salle University

Cultural differences in implicit theories and self-perceptions of traitedness were examined in the United States (N = 198), Mexico (N = 257), the Philippines (N = 212), and Japan (N = 225). Participants in all four cultures endorsed beliefs about the longitudinal stability, cross-situational consistency, and predictive validity of traits. At the same time, Americans and Mexicans, more than Filipinos and Japanese, endorsed implicit trait or dispositionist perspectives and described their own behavior as traited or consistent (i.e., lower in self-monitoring). Alternative measurement formats were compared and led to the conclusion that forced-choice measures may be advantageous in some cases, particularly when acquiescence bias may impact cross-cultural comparisons. Cultural differences were observed in participants' perceptions of the individualism-collectivism, dialecticism, and tightness-looseness of their respective cultures and these measures partially mediated some of the cultural differences in traitedness. Overall, the results supported an integration of trait and cultural psychology perspectives, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between culture and personality. © The Author(s) 2012.