Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?

This article explores the use of one of the most popular Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), Turnitin, to address the problem of plagiarism in the academe, specifically in the context of a private university in the Philippines. To investigate the possible benefits and limitations of the PDS as well...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bensal, Edwina R., Miraflores, Edna S., Tan, Neslie Carol C.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1287
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-2286
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-22862021-06-14T01:29:50Z Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin? Bensal, Edwina R. Miraflores, Edna S. Tan, Neslie Carol C. This article explores the use of one of the most popular Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), Turnitin, to address the problem of plagiarism in the academe, specifically in the context of a private university in the Philippines. To investigate the possible benefits and limitations of the PDS as well as the students' attitudes towards the software, this paper used the argumentative essays (checked via Turnitin) of 31 students in two introductory ESL writing classes along with their responses to two sets of self-reflection surveys. The results of the study reaffirmed certain laudable benefits claimed by Turnitin, while these also revealed a few limitations in the software's promise of detecting plagiarism, especially in the common instances of misuse of the PDS and blurred lines between the concepts of originality and plagiarism. The use of Turnitin was found to engender conflicting attitudes among the students towards avoiding this academic offense. Hence, this paper strongly recommends the careful guidance of stakeholders (teachers and students alike) in the proper use of the promising PDS as well as the re-evaluation of the plagiarism policy or approach of the institution in order to "educate-to-avoid" instead of promoting "detect-to-punish" measures (Starr & Graham-Matheson, 2011b, p. 5) in upholding academic integrity. 2013-10-25T07:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1287 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Plagiarism--Philippines Turnitin (Plagiarism tool) Intellectual Property Law Language and Literacy Education
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Plagiarism--Philippines
Turnitin (Plagiarism tool)
Intellectual Property Law
Language and Literacy Education
spellingShingle Plagiarism--Philippines
Turnitin (Plagiarism tool)
Intellectual Property Law
Language and Literacy Education
Bensal, Edwina R.
Miraflores, Edna S.
Tan, Neslie Carol C.
Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
description This article explores the use of one of the most popular Plagiarism Detection Software (PDS), Turnitin, to address the problem of plagiarism in the academe, specifically in the context of a private university in the Philippines. To investigate the possible benefits and limitations of the PDS as well as the students' attitudes towards the software, this paper used the argumentative essays (checked via Turnitin) of 31 students in two introductory ESL writing classes along with their responses to two sets of self-reflection surveys. The results of the study reaffirmed certain laudable benefits claimed by Turnitin, while these also revealed a few limitations in the software's promise of detecting plagiarism, especially in the common instances of misuse of the PDS and blurred lines between the concepts of originality and plagiarism. The use of Turnitin was found to engender conflicting attitudes among the students towards avoiding this academic offense. Hence, this paper strongly recommends the careful guidance of stakeholders (teachers and students alike) in the proper use of the promising PDS as well as the re-evaluation of the plagiarism policy or approach of the institution in order to "educate-to-avoid" instead of promoting "detect-to-punish" measures (Starr & Graham-Matheson, 2011b, p. 5) in upholding academic integrity.
format text
author Bensal, Edwina R.
Miraflores, Edna S.
Tan, Neslie Carol C.
author_facet Bensal, Edwina R.
Miraflores, Edna S.
Tan, Neslie Carol C.
author_sort Bensal, Edwina R.
title Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
title_short Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
title_full Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
title_fullStr Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
title_full_unstemmed Plagiarism: Shall we turn to Turnitin?
title_sort plagiarism: shall we turn to turnitin?
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2013
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1287
_version_ 1703980796644163584