Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure

This paper presents a methodology that holistically captures the uncertainty of judgment in 'quasi-collaborative' group decision-making in the context of the analytic hierarchy/network process. The proposed method is motivated mainly by the two uncertainty approaches that seemingly diverge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ocampo, Lanndon A., Clark, Eppie E., Chiu, Anthony S.F., Tan, Raymond Girard R.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1523
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/2522/type/native/viewcontent
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-2522
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-25222021-06-30T08:25:59Z Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure Ocampo, Lanndon A. Clark, Eppie E. Chiu, Anthony S.F. Tan, Raymond Girard R. This paper presents a methodology that holistically captures the uncertainty of judgment in 'quasi-collaborative' group decision-making in the context of the analytic hierarchy/network process. The proposed method is motivated mainly by the two uncertainty approaches that seemingly diverge in literature: The simulation approach and the fuzzy set theory (FST) approach. In the proposed method, FST is used to handle the judgmental uncertainty of individual decision-maker while simulation addresses randomness and uncertainty when individual judgments are aggregated as a group decision. An illustrative problem is presented in this paper along with a numerical experiment that attempts to compare the efficacy of the proposed methodology with existing methods. Results show that the method is more capable of handling uncertain group decisions through simulation runs and it can perform sensitivity analysis which is essential in testing robustness of judgment results. Finally, the proposed method can identify non-expert member of the group. © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text text/html https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1523 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/2522/type/native/viewcontent Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Group decision making Industrial Engineering
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Group decision making
Industrial Engineering
spellingShingle Group decision making
Industrial Engineering
Ocampo, Lanndon A.
Clark, Eppie E.
Chiu, Anthony S.F.
Tan, Raymond Girard R.
Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
description This paper presents a methodology that holistically captures the uncertainty of judgment in 'quasi-collaborative' group decision-making in the context of the analytic hierarchy/network process. The proposed method is motivated mainly by the two uncertainty approaches that seemingly diverge in literature: The simulation approach and the fuzzy set theory (FST) approach. In the proposed method, FST is used to handle the judgmental uncertainty of individual decision-maker while simulation addresses randomness and uncertainty when individual judgments are aggregated as a group decision. An illustrative problem is presented in this paper along with a numerical experiment that attempts to compare the efficacy of the proposed methodology with existing methods. Results show that the method is more capable of handling uncertain group decisions through simulation runs and it can perform sensitivity analysis which is essential in testing robustness of judgment results. Finally, the proposed method can identify non-expert member of the group. © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
format text
author Ocampo, Lanndon A.
Clark, Eppie E.
Chiu, Anthony S.F.
Tan, Raymond Girard R.
author_facet Ocampo, Lanndon A.
Clark, Eppie E.
Chiu, Anthony S.F.
Tan, Raymond Girard R.
author_sort Ocampo, Lanndon A.
title Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
title_short Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
title_full Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
title_fullStr Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
title_full_unstemmed Holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: The case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
title_sort holistically addressing uncertainty in group decision-making: the case of a 'quasi-collaborative' group structure
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1523
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/2522/type/native/viewcontent
_version_ 1705153018444382208