Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency
Software program optimization for improved execution speed can be achieved through modifying the program. Programs are usually written in high level languages then translated into low level assembly language. More coverage of optimization and performance analysis can be performed on low level than h...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1987 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-2986 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-29862021-08-07T02:38:39Z Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency Cempron, Jonathan Paul C. Salinas, Chudrack Shalym Y. Uy, Roger Luis Software program optimization for improved execution speed can be achieved through modifying the program. Programs are usually written in high level languages then translated into low level assembly language. More coverage of optimization and performance analysis can be performed on low level than high level language. Optimization improvement is measured in the difference in program execution performance. Several methods are available for measuring program performance are classified into static approaches and dynamic approaches. This paper presents an alternative method of more accurately measuring code performance statically than commonly used code analysis metrics. New metrics proposed are designed to expose effectiveness of optimization performed on code, specifically unroll optimizations. An optimization method, loop unroll is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the increased accuracy of the proposed metric. The results of the study show that measuring Instructions Performed and Instruction Latency is a more accurate static metric than Instruction Count and subsequently those based on it. © BEIESP. 2019-08-01T07:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1987 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Assembly languages (Electronic computers) Compilers (Computer programs) Computer software Computer architecture Computer Sciences |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
topic |
Assembly languages (Electronic computers) Compilers (Computer programs) Computer software Computer architecture Computer Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Assembly languages (Electronic computers) Compilers (Computer programs) Computer software Computer architecture Computer Sciences Cempron, Jonathan Paul C. Salinas, Chudrack Shalym Y. Uy, Roger Luis Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
description |
Software program optimization for improved execution speed can be achieved through modifying the program. Programs are usually written in high level languages then translated into low level assembly language. More coverage of optimization and performance analysis can be performed on low level than high level language. Optimization improvement is measured in the difference in program execution performance. Several methods are available for measuring program performance are classified into static approaches and dynamic approaches. This paper presents an alternative method of more accurately measuring code performance statically than commonly used code analysis metrics. New metrics proposed are designed to expose effectiveness of optimization performed on code, specifically unroll optimizations. An optimization method, loop unroll is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the increased accuracy of the proposed metric. The results of the study show that measuring Instructions Performed and Instruction Latency is a more accurate static metric than Instruction Count and subsequently those based on it. © BEIESP. |
format |
text |
author |
Cempron, Jonathan Paul C. Salinas, Chudrack Shalym Y. Uy, Roger Luis |
author_facet |
Cempron, Jonathan Paul C. Salinas, Chudrack Shalym Y. Uy, Roger Luis |
author_sort |
Cempron, Jonathan Paul C. |
title |
Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
title_short |
Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
title_full |
Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
title_fullStr |
Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
title_full_unstemmed |
Static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
title_sort |
static profiling of assembly code performance and optimization effectiveness using instructions performed and program latency |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/1987 |
_version_ |
1707787069940563968 |