Beall-ing O
In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-from-is thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more gener...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | text |
| 出版: |
Animo Repository
2020
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2142 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/3141/type/native/viewcontent |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
| 機構: | De La Salle University |
| id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-3141 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
eprints |
| spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-31412022-08-03T07:56:27Z Beall-ing O Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B. In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-from-is thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more general result is necessary for the viability of Beall’s proposal - a result, which implies that Hume’s thesis holds in the proposed framework. We prove this result and thus show that Beall’s proposal is indeed viable. © 2019 by Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń 2020-06-01T07:00:00Z text text/html https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2142 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/3141/type/native/viewcontent Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Logic Jc Beall, David Hume Weak Kleene Philosophy |
| institution |
De La Salle University |
| building |
De La Salle University Library |
| continent |
Asia |
| country |
Philippines Philippines |
| content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
| collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
| topic |
Logic Jc Beall, David Hume Weak Kleene Philosophy |
| spellingShingle |
Logic Jc Beall, David Hume Weak Kleene Philosophy Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B. Beall-ing O |
| description |
In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-from-is thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more general result is necessary for the viability of Beall’s proposal - a result, which implies that Hume’s thesis holds in the proposed framework. We prove this result and thus show that Beall’s proposal is indeed viable. © 2019 by Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń |
| format |
text |
| author |
Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B. |
| author_facet |
Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B. |
| author_sort |
Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven B. |
| title |
Beall-ing O |
| title_short |
Beall-ing O |
| title_full |
Beall-ing O |
| title_fullStr |
Beall-ing O |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Beall-ing O |
| title_sort |
beall-ing o |
| publisher |
Animo Repository |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2142 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/faculty_research/article/3141/type/native/viewcontent |
| _version_ |
1740844717911834624 |