From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region

During his two terms as U.S. president, former President Barack Obama made the Asia-Pacific region the focal point of American strategic attention. In November 2011, he announced the U.S. pivot to Asia. His goal was to constrain China from easing out the U.S. as East Asia’s strategic offshore balanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Castro, Renato Cruz
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2977
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-3976
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-39762021-11-18T06:36:58Z From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region De Castro, Renato Cruz During his two terms as U.S. president, former President Barack Obama made the Asia-Pacific region the focal point of American strategic attention. In November 2011, he announced the U.S. pivot to Asia. His goal was to constrain China from easing out the U.S. as East Asia’s strategic offshore balancer. Contrary to expectations, the 2016 election of Donald Trump, did not spell the end of the strategic rebalancing to Asia. For the Trump Administration, the Asia-Pacific remains a top security priority for two reasons. One, North Korea’s nuclear weapons program poses a clear and present danger to the U.S. and its allies in Northeast Asia. And two, China’s naval expansion, island-building activities, and militarization efforts in the South China Sea threaten not only the freedom of navigation but also the rules-based international order. In conclusion, the article argues that there is a great deal of consistency between the Obama Administration’s strategic rebalancing and the Trump Administration’s emerging Indo-Pacific Strategy. However, the current administration’s Indo-Pacific strategy reflects both continuity as well as discontinuity with its predecessor’s rebalancing policy. On the one hand, neither U.S. national security interests nor Asia’s importance to Washington has changed in the Trump Administration. On the other hand, its policy also reflects discontinuity as it characterized China as a threat to U.S. interests and is geared to engage this emergent power in a long strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific region. © 2019, Tamkang University. All rights reserved. 2019-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2977 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository United States—Foreign relations—Indo-Pacific Region Indo-Pacific Region—Foreign relations—United States Balance of power International Relations Political Science
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic United States—Foreign relations—Indo-Pacific Region
Indo-Pacific Region—Foreign relations—United States
Balance of power
International Relations
Political Science
spellingShingle United States—Foreign relations—Indo-Pacific Region
Indo-Pacific Region—Foreign relations—United States
Balance of power
International Relations
Political Science
De Castro, Renato Cruz
From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
description During his two terms as U.S. president, former President Barack Obama made the Asia-Pacific region the focal point of American strategic attention. In November 2011, he announced the U.S. pivot to Asia. His goal was to constrain China from easing out the U.S. as East Asia’s strategic offshore balancer. Contrary to expectations, the 2016 election of Donald Trump, did not spell the end of the strategic rebalancing to Asia. For the Trump Administration, the Asia-Pacific remains a top security priority for two reasons. One, North Korea’s nuclear weapons program poses a clear and present danger to the U.S. and its allies in Northeast Asia. And two, China’s naval expansion, island-building activities, and militarization efforts in the South China Sea threaten not only the freedom of navigation but also the rules-based international order. In conclusion, the article argues that there is a great deal of consistency between the Obama Administration’s strategic rebalancing and the Trump Administration’s emerging Indo-Pacific Strategy. However, the current administration’s Indo-Pacific strategy reflects both continuity as well as discontinuity with its predecessor’s rebalancing policy. On the one hand, neither U.S. national security interests nor Asia’s importance to Washington has changed in the Trump Administration. On the other hand, its policy also reflects discontinuity as it characterized China as a threat to U.S. interests and is geared to engage this emergent power in a long strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific region. © 2019, Tamkang University. All rights reserved.
format text
author De Castro, Renato Cruz
author_facet De Castro, Renato Cruz
author_sort De Castro, Renato Cruz
title From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
title_short From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
title_full From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
title_fullStr From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
title_full_unstemmed From rebalancing to competition: The Trump administration’s grand strategy for the Indo-Pacific Region
title_sort from rebalancing to competition: the trump administration’s grand strategy for the indo-pacific region
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2019
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2977
_version_ 1718383297477738496