The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?

From 2011 to 2016, then US President Barack Obama vigorously pursued the policy of strategic rebalancing to Asia. The policy's underlying goal was to prevent China from becoming the dominant power in the Asia–Pacific region. Unfortunately, the Obama administration's efforts were thwarted b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Castro, Renato Cruz
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2978
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-3977
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-39772021-11-18T06:54:38Z The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017? De Castro, Renato Cruz From 2011 to 2016, then US President Barack Obama vigorously pursued the policy of strategic rebalancing to Asia. The policy's underlying goal was to prevent China from becoming the dominant power in the Asia–Pacific region. Unfortunately, the Obama administration's efforts were thwarted by the strategy's lack of a deterrence component, distracting shifts and crises in certain parts of the world, and the failure of the US Congress to pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership into law. The 2016 election of Donald Trump, however, does not necessarily mean that the strategic rebalancing to Asia is doomed, if not already dead. It is still a “work in progress,” as the region remains a top security priority for Washington for two reasons. First, North Korea's nuclear weapons program poses a clear and present danger to the United States; and second, China's naval build-up and island-building and militarization activities in the South China Sea threaten not only the freedom of navigation but also the rules-based international order. Consequently, the Trump administration has directed the US military to proceed with the rebalancing of its forces and capabilities in the Asia–Pacific. In conclusion, this article argues that despite his administration's rhetoric that the rebalancing is dead in the water, President Trump is heeding his predecessor's advice that “engaging in the Asia–Pacific is critical to America's future prosperity and security.” © 2018 Center for International Studies, Inha University 2018-08-01T07:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2978 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository United States--Foreign relations administration United States—Foreign relations—China China—Foreign relations—United States Balance of power United States—Foreign relations—Pacific Area Pacific Area—Foreign relations—United States International Relations
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic United States--Foreign relations administration
United States—Foreign relations—China
China—Foreign relations—United States
Balance of power
United States—Foreign relations—Pacific Area
Pacific Area—Foreign relations—United States
International Relations
spellingShingle United States--Foreign relations administration
United States—Foreign relations—China
China—Foreign relations—United States
Balance of power
United States—Foreign relations—Pacific Area
Pacific Area—Foreign relations—United States
International Relations
De Castro, Renato Cruz
The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
description From 2011 to 2016, then US President Barack Obama vigorously pursued the policy of strategic rebalancing to Asia. The policy's underlying goal was to prevent China from becoming the dominant power in the Asia–Pacific region. Unfortunately, the Obama administration's efforts were thwarted by the strategy's lack of a deterrence component, distracting shifts and crises in certain parts of the world, and the failure of the US Congress to pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership into law. The 2016 election of Donald Trump, however, does not necessarily mean that the strategic rebalancing to Asia is doomed, if not already dead. It is still a “work in progress,” as the region remains a top security priority for Washington for two reasons. First, North Korea's nuclear weapons program poses a clear and present danger to the United States; and second, China's naval build-up and island-building and militarization activities in the South China Sea threaten not only the freedom of navigation but also the rules-based international order. Consequently, the Trump administration has directed the US military to proceed with the rebalancing of its forces and capabilities in the Asia–Pacific. In conclusion, this article argues that despite his administration's rhetoric that the rebalancing is dead in the water, President Trump is heeding his predecessor's advice that “engaging in the Asia–Pacific is critical to America's future prosperity and security.” © 2018 Center for International Studies, Inha University
format text
author De Castro, Renato Cruz
author_facet De Castro, Renato Cruz
author_sort De Castro, Renato Cruz
title The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
title_short The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
title_full The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
title_fullStr The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
title_full_unstemmed The Obama administration's strategic rebalancing to Asia: Quo vadis in 2017?
title_sort obama administration's strategic rebalancing to asia: quo vadis in 2017?
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2018
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/2978
_version_ 1718383297719959552