Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage

Goethite is a dominant component of nickel laterite ores, which is capable of adsorbing metal ions in water. The potential of the unused low-grade nickel ore (LGO) to treat synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) was investigated. LGO characterization identified the presence of goethite (α-FeOOH), calciu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Turingan, Casey Oliver A., Fabella, Divina Joyce A., Sadol, Kim Ahmed N., Beltran, Arnel B., Alorro, Richard D., Orbecido, Aileen H.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3289
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-4272
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-42722021-04-20T01:01:33Z Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage Turingan, Casey Oliver A. Fabella, Divina Joyce A. Sadol, Kim Ahmed N. Beltran, Arnel B. Alorro, Richard D. Orbecido, Aileen H. Goethite is a dominant component of nickel laterite ores, which is capable of adsorbing metal ions in water. The potential of the unused low-grade nickel ore (LGO) to treat synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) was investigated. LGO characterization identified the presence of goethite (α-FeOOH), calcium oxide (CaO), and manganese aluminum oxide. The performance of LGO for AMD treatment was evaluated using jar test and compared with limestone. At 0.5 ml AMD/g media, LGO increased the pH of AMD to 5.36 while limestone completely neutralized it. LGO removed more than 99% of Al and Fe, 94% of Ni, and 93% of sulfates compared to a 70% sulfate removal using limestone. The lower sulfate removal may be due to the armouring of the limestone surface. Furthermore, a batch test was conducted using both LGO and limestone as layered treatment media in an oxic and anoxic setup. Effluent pH remained constant while conductivity and TDS stabilize at 2,000 μS/cm and 1,000 ppm, respectively. Both setups achieved 99% removal of Fe and Al, ~90% Ni removal, and between 70% and 80% sulfate removal. These results indicate that LGO is a possible alternative material to be used for heavy metal adsorption for AMD treatment. © 2020 Curtin University and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-05-01T07:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3289 info:doi/10.1002/apj.2457 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Nickel ores Limestone Goethite Acid mine drainage Civil Engineering
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Nickel ores
Limestone
Goethite
Acid mine drainage
Civil Engineering
spellingShingle Nickel ores
Limestone
Goethite
Acid mine drainage
Civil Engineering
Turingan, Casey Oliver A.
Fabella, Divina Joyce A.
Sadol, Kim Ahmed N.
Beltran, Arnel B.
Alorro, Richard D.
Orbecido, Aileen H.
Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
description Goethite is a dominant component of nickel laterite ores, which is capable of adsorbing metal ions in water. The potential of the unused low-grade nickel ore (LGO) to treat synthetic acid mine drainage (AMD) was investigated. LGO characterization identified the presence of goethite (α-FeOOH), calcium oxide (CaO), and manganese aluminum oxide. The performance of LGO for AMD treatment was evaluated using jar test and compared with limestone. At 0.5 ml AMD/g media, LGO increased the pH of AMD to 5.36 while limestone completely neutralized it. LGO removed more than 99% of Al and Fe, 94% of Ni, and 93% of sulfates compared to a 70% sulfate removal using limestone. The lower sulfate removal may be due to the armouring of the limestone surface. Furthermore, a batch test was conducted using both LGO and limestone as layered treatment media in an oxic and anoxic setup. Effluent pH remained constant while conductivity and TDS stabilize at 2,000 μS/cm and 1,000 ppm, respectively. Both setups achieved 99% removal of Fe and Al, ~90% Ni removal, and between 70% and 80% sulfate removal. These results indicate that LGO is a possible alternative material to be used for heavy metal adsorption for AMD treatment. © 2020 Curtin University and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format text
author Turingan, Casey Oliver A.
Fabella, Divina Joyce A.
Sadol, Kim Ahmed N.
Beltran, Arnel B.
Alorro, Richard D.
Orbecido, Aileen H.
author_facet Turingan, Casey Oliver A.
Fabella, Divina Joyce A.
Sadol, Kim Ahmed N.
Beltran, Arnel B.
Alorro, Richard D.
Orbecido, Aileen H.
author_sort Turingan, Casey Oliver A.
title Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
title_short Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
title_full Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
title_fullStr Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
title_sort comparing the performance of low-grade nickel ore and limestone for treatment of synthetic acid mine drainage
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3289
_version_ 1767195869906468864