Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia
The debate surrounding the United States’ hub-and-spokes alliance model in the Asia-Pacific, that is, whether its endurance is a testament to its durability or whether its inability to face up to contemporary challenges reflects its failure—is best captured by recent norm research in International R...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3456 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-4458 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-44582021-09-09T01:55:49Z Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia Willoughby, Charmaine Misalucha- The debate surrounding the United States’ hub-and-spokes alliance model in the Asia-Pacific, that is, whether its endurance is a testament to its durability or whether its inability to face up to contemporary challenges reflects its failure—is best captured by recent norm research in International Relations. It can be argued that the U.S. hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia is not failing but is simply showing signs of contestation. The evolution of this network of regional security arrangements from U.S. alliances in Southeast Asia (with the Philippines and Thailand) to American security partnerships in that subregion (strategic partnership with Singapore and comprehensive partnership with Vietnam) reflects applicatory contestation. At the same time, the China factor and Washington’s evolving Asia strategy, which competes with the Middle East and with the “America First” instincts of the Trump administration, challenge the core of the San Francisco System’s validity. Hence, while the hub-and-spokes model is merely showing signs of contestation, the fact that it is undergoing validity contestation serves as a cautionary tale. Those U.S. policymakers supporting it will need to implement steps to avoid its complete erosion. © 2019 Policy Studies Organization 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3456 info:doi/10.1111/aspp.12511 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository United States--Foreign relations--Southeast Asia Southeast Asia--Foreign relations--United States Alliances International Relations |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
topic |
United States--Foreign relations--Southeast Asia Southeast Asia--Foreign relations--United States Alliances International Relations |
spellingShingle |
United States--Foreign relations--Southeast Asia Southeast Asia--Foreign relations--United States Alliances International Relations Willoughby, Charmaine Misalucha- Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
description |
The debate surrounding the United States’ hub-and-spokes alliance model in the Asia-Pacific, that is, whether its endurance is a testament to its durability or whether its inability to face up to contemporary challenges reflects its failure—is best captured by recent norm research in International Relations. It can be argued that the U.S. hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia is not failing but is simply showing signs of contestation. The evolution of this network of regional security arrangements from U.S. alliances in Southeast Asia (with the Philippines and Thailand) to American security partnerships in that subregion (strategic partnership with Singapore and comprehensive partnership with Vietnam) reflects applicatory contestation. At the same time, the China factor and Washington’s evolving Asia strategy, which competes with the Middle East and with the “America First” instincts of the Trump administration, challenge the core of the San Francisco System’s validity. Hence, while the hub-and-spokes model is merely showing signs of contestation, the fact that it is undergoing validity contestation serves as a cautionary tale. Those U.S. policymakers supporting it will need to implement steps to avoid its complete erosion. © 2019 Policy Studies Organization |
format |
text |
author |
Willoughby, Charmaine Misalucha- |
author_facet |
Willoughby, Charmaine Misalucha- |
author_sort |
Willoughby, Charmaine Misalucha- |
title |
Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
title_short |
Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
title_full |
Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
title_fullStr |
Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contesting the hub-and-spokes model in Southeast Asia |
title_sort |
contesting the hub-and-spokes model in southeast asia |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/3456 |
_version_ |
1767195909970460672 |