Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective

In this paper, I discuss the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and Creation in view of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian influences. My argument is that although Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism represent an important factor in the development of a Christian understanding of the universe and the prin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Festin, Lorenz Moises J.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/5865
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-6617
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:faculty_research-66172022-05-16T03:30:24Z Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective Festin, Lorenz Moises J. In this paper, I discuss the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and Creation in view of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian influences. My argument is that although Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism represent an important factor in the development of a Christian understanding of the universe and the principle of its existence, the Christina doctrine differs substantially from the two philosophical systems, so that it cannot simply be reduced to them. The paper has three parts. First, I begin by making a brief treatment of the Christian doctrine of Trinity and Creation. Creation, it must be pointed out, is not Christianity’s most fundamental teaching. It is not the starting point in doing Christian theology. Instead, it is a doctrine that came to be developed as corollary to the more basic teaching about the Trinitarian God. In the second part, I treat Neoplatonic and Aristotelian influences on the doctrine of creation. Here I discuss the parallelism between the Neoplatonic doctrine of the One, from which the physical world proceeds, and the Christian teaching about the Trinitarian God, who, out of his infinite love and overflowing goodness, pours himself out ot a finite being, the universe, by creating it. In the same vein, I also underline the similarity between the Aristotelian teaching of the Unmoved Mover and the Christian conception of God who invites creatures to take part in the divine community of love. This culminates in what Aquinas calls “beatitude perfecta.” Finally, in the last part, I point out the diversity of Christian belief from the two philosophical schools of thought. More specifically, I accentuate the weight of the element of freedom in the creative act of the Trinitarian God, and the personal dimension that characterizes his rapport with his creatures. 2022-05-25T09:36:50Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/5865 Faculty Research Work Animo Repository Trinity Creation Philosophy Religion
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Trinity
Creation
Philosophy
Religion
spellingShingle Trinity
Creation
Philosophy
Religion
Festin, Lorenz Moises J.
Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
description In this paper, I discuss the Christian doctrine of the Trinity and Creation in view of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian influences. My argument is that although Neoplatonism and Aristotelianism represent an important factor in the development of a Christian understanding of the universe and the principle of its existence, the Christina doctrine differs substantially from the two philosophical systems, so that it cannot simply be reduced to them. The paper has three parts. First, I begin by making a brief treatment of the Christian doctrine of Trinity and Creation. Creation, it must be pointed out, is not Christianity’s most fundamental teaching. It is not the starting point in doing Christian theology. Instead, it is a doctrine that came to be developed as corollary to the more basic teaching about the Trinitarian God. In the second part, I treat Neoplatonic and Aristotelian influences on the doctrine of creation. Here I discuss the parallelism between the Neoplatonic doctrine of the One, from which the physical world proceeds, and the Christian teaching about the Trinitarian God, who, out of his infinite love and overflowing goodness, pours himself out ot a finite being, the universe, by creating it. In the same vein, I also underline the similarity between the Aristotelian teaching of the Unmoved Mover and the Christian conception of God who invites creatures to take part in the divine community of love. This culminates in what Aquinas calls “beatitude perfecta.” Finally, in the last part, I point out the diversity of Christian belief from the two philosophical schools of thought. More specifically, I accentuate the weight of the element of freedom in the creative act of the Trinitarian God, and the personal dimension that characterizes his rapport with his creatures.
format text
author Festin, Lorenz Moises J.
author_facet Festin, Lorenz Moises J.
author_sort Festin, Lorenz Moises J.
title Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
title_short Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
title_full Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
title_fullStr Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
title_full_unstemmed Trinity and Creation: The significance of the Neoplatonic and Aristotelian perspective
title_sort trinity and creation: the significance of the neoplatonic and aristotelian perspective
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2022
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/5865
_version_ 1767196397936836608