ICJ arbitration of Southeast Asian territorial disputes and post-Cold War IR theories: A case for analytic eclecticism?
Resorting to ICJ arbitration may lead observers to think that there’s either the lack of a viable regional mechanism for resolving conflict, or the unwillingness of states to make use of existing mechanisms. On the contrary, it can be argued that ICJ arbitration does not undermine existing mechanism...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Briones, Nikki S. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/5800 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Similar Items
-
ICJ arbitration of territorial disputes in Southeast Asia and implications for regional conflict management: Research report
by: Briones, Nikki S.
Published: (2004) -
The challenge of conflict resolution in the South China Sea dispute: Examining the prospect of a stable peace in East Asia
by: De Castro, Renato Cruz
Published: (2016) -
Maritime security in the South China Sea: The indispensable role of institutionally driven conflict management
by: Heydarian, Richard Javad, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Contemporary Challenges in Regulating Global Crises
by: FINDLAY, Mark
Published: (2013) -
Benham rise: Boon or bane: A case study of winning the Benham Rise
by: Ligon, Antonio A.
Published: (2015)