Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows

The environmental impact of international trade is a concerning issue in the fight against climate change. Trade liberalization—combined with globally fragmented environmental policies—is often associated with emissions leakages and the formation of pollution havens because trade allows countries to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quirapas, Dan André, Chan, Brian Irvyn, Lamberte, Albert, Rapada, Maria Zunally, Yu, Krista Danielle
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/res_aki/5
https://www.dlsu-aki.com/uploads/1/0/2/2/102266760/dlsu-aki_working_paper_series_2021-12-081.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:res_aki-1005
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:res_aki-10052023-03-30T09:44:10Z Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows Quirapas, Dan André Chan, Brian Irvyn Lamberte, Albert Rapada, Maria Zunally Yu, Krista Danielle The environmental impact of international trade is a concerning issue in the fight against climate change. Trade liberalization—combined with globally fragmented environmental policies—is often associated with emissions leakages and the formation of pollution havens because trade allows countries to outsource emissions-intensive production to countries with weaker environmental regulations. Literature on this subject has therefore suggested that a globally coordinated policy response is necessary to mitigate the impact of trade on climate change. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by identifying unilateral and multilateral actions countries can take to mitigate the impact of embodied emissions associated with bilateral trade. Through a gravity model estimating the impact of regulation, domestic carbon intensities, and several other gravity variables, this study is able to provide novel conclusions in the context of the existing literature. Particularly, a unilateral strengthening of environmental regulation by the importing country can contribute to climate change mitigation in the best case, and has a statistically insignificant effect in the worst case. This study also finds that multilateral coordination in technological diffusion and trading agreements can also aid in mitigation efforts. 2021-12-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/res_aki/5 https://www.dlsu-aki.com/uploads/1/0/2/2/102266760/dlsu-aki_working_paper_series_2021-12-081.pdf Angelo King Institute for Economic and Business Studies Animo Repository gravity model emissions embodied in trade climate change mitigation pollution haven hypothesis
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic gravity model
emissions embodied in trade
climate change mitigation
pollution haven hypothesis
spellingShingle gravity model
emissions embodied in trade
climate change mitigation
pollution haven hypothesis
Quirapas, Dan André
Chan, Brian Irvyn
Lamberte, Albert
Rapada, Maria Zunally
Yu, Krista Danielle
Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
description The environmental impact of international trade is a concerning issue in the fight against climate change. Trade liberalization—combined with globally fragmented environmental policies—is often associated with emissions leakages and the formation of pollution havens because trade allows countries to outsource emissions-intensive production to countries with weaker environmental regulations. Literature on this subject has therefore suggested that a globally coordinated policy response is necessary to mitigate the impact of trade on climate change. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by identifying unilateral and multilateral actions countries can take to mitigate the impact of embodied emissions associated with bilateral trade. Through a gravity model estimating the impact of regulation, domestic carbon intensities, and several other gravity variables, this study is able to provide novel conclusions in the context of the existing literature. Particularly, a unilateral strengthening of environmental regulation by the importing country can contribute to climate change mitigation in the best case, and has a statistically insignificant effect in the worst case. This study also finds that multilateral coordination in technological diffusion and trading agreements can also aid in mitigation efforts.
format text
author Quirapas, Dan André
Chan, Brian Irvyn
Lamberte, Albert
Rapada, Maria Zunally
Yu, Krista Danielle
author_facet Quirapas, Dan André
Chan, Brian Irvyn
Lamberte, Albert
Rapada, Maria Zunally
Yu, Krista Danielle
author_sort Quirapas, Dan André
title Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
title_short Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
title_full Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
title_fullStr Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
title_full_unstemmed Climate change and trade: What unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
title_sort climate change and trade: what unilateral or multilateral actions are needed to mitigate emissions embodied in trade flows
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2021
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/res_aki/5
https://www.dlsu-aki.com/uploads/1/0/2/2/102266760/dlsu-aki_working_paper_series_2021-12-081.pdf
_version_ 1762035187067125760