Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach

Tall buildings are particularly susceptible to wind loads, which usually govern the design of lateral load-resisting systems. Therefore, wind loads must be adequately evaluated in the design of tall buildings. Aerodynamic modifications are highly effective tools for reducing wind loads. This paper i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Masoodi, A.H.H., Abbas, Y.M., Alkhatib, F., Khan, M.I., Shafiq, N., ElGawady, M.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2023
Online Access:http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/37341/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163161703&doi=10.1016%2fj.jobe.2023.107017&partnerID=40&md5=218b7b8d49b00e632414cabbc066202c
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Teknologi Petronas
id oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:37341
record_format eprints
spelling oai:scholars.utp.edu.my:373412023-10-04T08:42:04Z http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/37341/ Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach Al-Masoodi, A.H.H. Abbas, Y.M. Alkhatib, F. Khan, M.I. Shafiq, N. ElGawady, M. Tall buildings are particularly susceptible to wind loads, which usually govern the design of lateral load-resisting systems. Therefore, wind loads must be adequately evaluated in the design of tall buildings. Aerodynamic modifications are highly effective tools for reducing wind loads. This paper investigates the effectiveness of corner modification optimization applied on an octagonal-plan-shaped model using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation computational fluid dynamics associated with finite element analysis to alleviate wind-induced loads. Corner aerodynamic modifications such as chamfered, recessed, rounded, and fins are investigated. The corner modification was limited to a cutting radius of 6 m (12 of the building width) with a 0.5 m increment. The main considerations for this optimization procedure are top deflection, inter-story drifts, and the optimal number of additional floors. All corner modifications improve the building's performance, except fins corners resulting in adverse effects. In addition, 47 simulation examples from the case study are evaluated, presented, and discussed. With one additional floor, the optimum shape was able to reduce overall wind loads by 31.67, resulting in a reduction in the structural response of 24.89 and 24.18 in maximum top deflection and inter-story drift, respectively. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Ltd 2023 Article NonPeerReviewed Al-Masoodi, A.H.H. and Abbas, Y.M. and Alkhatib, F. and Khan, M.I. and Shafiq, N. and ElGawady, M. (2023) Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 76. ISSN 23527102 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163161703&doi=10.1016%2fj.jobe.2023.107017&partnerID=40&md5=218b7b8d49b00e632414cabbc066202c 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107017 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107017 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107017
institution Universiti Teknologi Petronas
building UTP Resource Centre
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknologi Petronas
content_source UTP Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utp.edu.my/
description Tall buildings are particularly susceptible to wind loads, which usually govern the design of lateral load-resisting systems. Therefore, wind loads must be adequately evaluated in the design of tall buildings. Aerodynamic modifications are highly effective tools for reducing wind loads. This paper investigates the effectiveness of corner modification optimization applied on an octagonal-plan-shaped model using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation computational fluid dynamics associated with finite element analysis to alleviate wind-induced loads. Corner aerodynamic modifications such as chamfered, recessed, rounded, and fins are investigated. The corner modification was limited to a cutting radius of 6 m (12 of the building width) with a 0.5 m increment. The main considerations for this optimization procedure are top deflection, inter-story drifts, and the optimal number of additional floors. All corner modifications improve the building's performance, except fins corners resulting in adverse effects. In addition, 47 simulation examples from the case study are evaluated, presented, and discussed. With one additional floor, the optimum shape was able to reduce overall wind loads by 31.67, resulting in a reduction in the structural response of 24.89 and 24.18 in maximum top deflection and inter-story drift, respectively. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
format Article
author Al-Masoodi, A.H.H.
Abbas, Y.M.
Alkhatib, F.
Khan, M.I.
Shafiq, N.
ElGawady, M.
spellingShingle Al-Masoodi, A.H.H.
Abbas, Y.M.
Alkhatib, F.
Khan, M.I.
Shafiq, N.
ElGawady, M.
Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
author_facet Al-Masoodi, A.H.H.
Abbas, Y.M.
Alkhatib, F.
Khan, M.I.
Shafiq, N.
ElGawady, M.
author_sort Al-Masoodi, A.H.H.
title Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
title_short Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
title_full Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
title_fullStr Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
title_full_unstemmed Aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
title_sort aerodynamic optimization for corner modification of octagonal-shape tall buildings using computational approach
publisher Elsevier Ltd
publishDate 2023
url http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/37341/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163161703&doi=10.1016%2fj.jobe.2023.107017&partnerID=40&md5=218b7b8d49b00e632414cabbc066202c
_version_ 1779441368164204544