Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation

This is a study of the effects of sectoral FDI inflows on the rates of change of forest land and the ecological footprint of economic activity measured in forest land. We test the “FDI ecological halo” hypothesis (Doytch, 2020) for nine distinct sectoral FDI inflows, including agricultural FDI, mini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doytch, Nadia, Ashraf, Ayesha, Nguyen, Canh Phuc
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/asog-pubs/285
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/asog-pubs/article/1287/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S2665972724000217_main.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.asog-pubs-1287
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.asog-pubs-12872024-04-15T06:18:46Z Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation Doytch, Nadia Ashraf, Ayesha Nguyen, Canh Phuc This is a study of the effects of sectoral FDI inflows on the rates of change of forest land and the ecological footprint of economic activity measured in forest land. We test the “FDI ecological halo” hypothesis (Doytch, 2020) for nine distinct sectoral FDI inflows, including agricultural FDI, mining FDI, manufacturing FDI, construction FDI, financial FDI, transport FDI, tourism FDI, communications FDI, and trade services FDI, in addition to total FDI, using a global sample of countries and a GMM econometric approach. We find that one percentage increase (% GDP) in agricultural FDI, mining FDI, manufacturing FDI, and construction FDI can reduce 2.87 %, 1.76 %, 0.19 %, and 1.28 % of forest land area, respectively, and all but manufacturing FDI, increase the forest land footprint from. At the same time, the results associated with services FDI are mixed: trade services FDI hurts the forest environment, while one percentage increase (% GDP) in communications FDI, financial FDI, and transport FDI can increase forest land area to 0.24 %, 0.02 %, and 3.02 %, respectively. In the case of tourism FDI, the results are mixed. The results suggest that FDI in sectors that are “closer to nature”, such as agriculture and mining are more prone to cause harm to forests and therefore need to be regulated with maximum stringency. Some services FDI, such as communications FDI and financial FDI could be stimulated without harm to the forest environment. 2024-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/asog-pubs/285 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/asog-pubs/article/1287/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S2665972724000217_main.pdf Ateneo School of Government Publications Archīum Ateneo FDI ecological halo Forest ecological footprint Forest land Sectoral FDI Economic Policy Environmental Policy Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Social and Behavioral Sciences
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic FDI ecological halo
Forest ecological footprint
Forest land
Sectoral FDI
Economic Policy
Environmental Policy
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Social and Behavioral Sciences
spellingShingle FDI ecological halo
Forest ecological footprint
Forest land
Sectoral FDI
Economic Policy
Environmental Policy
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Doytch, Nadia
Ashraf, Ayesha
Nguyen, Canh Phuc
Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
description This is a study of the effects of sectoral FDI inflows on the rates of change of forest land and the ecological footprint of economic activity measured in forest land. We test the “FDI ecological halo” hypothesis (Doytch, 2020) for nine distinct sectoral FDI inflows, including agricultural FDI, mining FDI, manufacturing FDI, construction FDI, financial FDI, transport FDI, tourism FDI, communications FDI, and trade services FDI, in addition to total FDI, using a global sample of countries and a GMM econometric approach. We find that one percentage increase (% GDP) in agricultural FDI, mining FDI, manufacturing FDI, and construction FDI can reduce 2.87 %, 1.76 %, 0.19 %, and 1.28 % of forest land area, respectively, and all but manufacturing FDI, increase the forest land footprint from. At the same time, the results associated with services FDI are mixed: trade services FDI hurts the forest environment, while one percentage increase (% GDP) in communications FDI, financial FDI, and transport FDI can increase forest land area to 0.24 %, 0.02 %, and 3.02 %, respectively. In the case of tourism FDI, the results are mixed. The results suggest that FDI in sectors that are “closer to nature”, such as agriculture and mining are more prone to cause harm to forests and therefore need to be regulated with maximum stringency. Some services FDI, such as communications FDI and financial FDI could be stimulated without harm to the forest environment.
format text
author Doytch, Nadia
Ashraf, Ayesha
Nguyen, Canh Phuc
author_facet Doytch, Nadia
Ashraf, Ayesha
Nguyen, Canh Phuc
author_sort Doytch, Nadia
title Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
title_short Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
title_full Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
title_fullStr Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Foreign Direct Investment and Forest Land: A Sectoral Investigation
title_sort foreign direct investment and forest land: a sectoral investigation
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/asog-pubs/285
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/asog-pubs/article/1287/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S2665972724000217_main.pdf
_version_ 1797546522198409216