Government Medical Practitioners as Conscientious Objectors: An Examination of the Compelling State Interest and Religious Freedom in Imbong v. Ochoa, Jr.
For more than a decade, advocates have pushed for the passage of a law that would facilitate the full realization of the constitutionally protected right to reproductive and sexual health. After opposition from religious groups, The Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012, also kn...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Sta. Maria, Amparita |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/7 http://ateneolawjournal.com/main/varticle/1217 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
Similar Items
-
The Yellow Wood: Diverging Roads on Mandatory Religious Exemption Regimes in the United States and the Philippines
by: Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
Published: (2017) -
Freedom of Speech and Contempt by Scandalizing the Court in Singapore
by: LEE, Jack Tsen-Ta
Published: (2009) -
Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives
by: Neo, Jaclyn, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Tilted interpretations: Reproductive health law and practice in the Philippines
by: Sta. Maria, Amparita
Published: (2019) -
Testing Constitutional Waters: Balancing State Power, Economic Development and Respect for Human Rights
by: Candelaria, Sedfrey M, et al.
Published: (2006)