Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law

Philippine jurisprudence has been consistent in using the four-fold test to determine the presence of an employer-employee relationship. According to this test, for an employer-employee relationship to arise, the following elements must be present: (1) selection and engagement of the employee; (2) p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2014
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/39
http://ateneolawjournal.com/main/varticle/726
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-1038
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-10382022-03-28T06:31:29Z Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law Ingles, Ignatius Michael D Philippine jurisprudence has been consistent in using the four-fold test to determine the presence of an employer-employee relationship. According to this test, for an employer-employee relationship to arise, the following elements must be present: (1) selection and engagement of the employee; (2) payment of wages; (3) power of dismissal over the employee; and (4) power to control the employee’s conduct. In this Article, the Author used this four-fold test to determine if professional athletes are considered employees of their respective teams. The Author defined a professional athlete as someone who receives any kind of payment for participating in sports. Consequently, the Author differentiated the situation of athletes in individual sports and team sports. It was concluded that an employer-employee relationship is not present in individual sports since the necessary element of control by the hiring parties is not present. However, the situation of professional athletes in team sports is different. It was stated by the Author that the four elements under the four-fold test is undoubtedly present in team sports. This form of control usually takes the form of certain philosophy or methodology on how the players of the team must play the game. Working on this context, the Author further argued that the existence of an employer-employee relationship in sports has number of legal implications — from labor law to taxation law. 2014-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/39 http://ateneolawjournal.com/main/varticle/726 Ateneo School of Law Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Employer-Employee Relationship Four-Fold Test Labor Labor Law Sports Law Wage Labor and Employment Law Law Sports Studies
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Employer-Employee Relationship
Four-Fold Test
Labor
Labor Law
Sports Law
Wage
Labor and Employment Law
Law
Sports Studies
spellingShingle Employer-Employee Relationship
Four-Fold Test
Labor
Labor Law
Sports Law
Wage
Labor and Employment Law
Law
Sports Studies
Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
description Philippine jurisprudence has been consistent in using the four-fold test to determine the presence of an employer-employee relationship. According to this test, for an employer-employee relationship to arise, the following elements must be present: (1) selection and engagement of the employee; (2) payment of wages; (3) power of dismissal over the employee; and (4) power to control the employee’s conduct. In this Article, the Author used this four-fold test to determine if professional athletes are considered employees of their respective teams. The Author defined a professional athlete as someone who receives any kind of payment for participating in sports. Consequently, the Author differentiated the situation of athletes in individual sports and team sports. It was concluded that an employer-employee relationship is not present in individual sports since the necessary element of control by the hiring parties is not present. However, the situation of professional athletes in team sports is different. It was stated by the Author that the four elements under the four-fold test is undoubtedly present in team sports. This form of control usually takes the form of certain philosophy or methodology on how the players of the team must play the game. Working on this context, the Author further argued that the existence of an employer-employee relationship in sports has number of legal implications — from labor law to taxation law.
format text
author Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
author_facet Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
author_sort Ingles, Ignatius Michael D
title Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
title_short Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
title_full Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
title_fullStr Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
title_full_unstemmed Playing for Wages: Defining the Legal Relationship Between Professional Athlete and Team, a Sports Law Perspective on Philippine Labor Law
title_sort playing for wages: defining the legal relationship between professional athlete and team, a sports law perspective on philippine labor law
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2014
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/39
http://ateneolawjournal.com/main/varticle/726
_version_ 1728621322836115456