De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines

While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the histo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V.
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-1053
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-10532024-03-14T07:48:00Z De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the historical contexts as well as the domestic and international factors influencing them. In addition, this chapter discusses the challenges still faced by the two countries given that even while classified as abolitionist, the situations in both Cambodia and the Philippines are not unreservedly ideal—Cambodia has not ratified the Second Optional Protocol and the Philippine government’s recent authoritarian turn has seen an intensified campaign to reimpose capital punishment through legislation. The chapter concludes by conceding that while neither can be considered model abolitionist States and despite the persistence of imperfect situations, lessons can still be learned from their experiences such as the superiority of constitutional proscriptions. Hopefully, the notion that capital punishment is deeply entrenched, intractable, and necessary in the legal systems of ASEAN Member-States can soon be dispelled as fallacy. 2023-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7 Ateneo School of Law Publications Archīum Ateneo Asian Studies Criminology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Public Policy Social and Behavioral Sciences Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Sociology
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Asian Studies
Criminology
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Public Policy
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Sociology
spellingShingle Asian Studies
Criminology
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Public Policy
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance
Sociology
Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V.
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
description While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the historical contexts as well as the domestic and international factors influencing them. In addition, this chapter discusses the challenges still faced by the two countries given that even while classified as abolitionist, the situations in both Cambodia and the Philippines are not unreservedly ideal—Cambodia has not ratified the Second Optional Protocol and the Philippine government’s recent authoritarian turn has seen an intensified campaign to reimpose capital punishment through legislation. The chapter concludes by conceding that while neither can be considered model abolitionist States and despite the persistence of imperfect situations, lessons can still be learned from their experiences such as the superiority of constitutional proscriptions. Hopefully, the notion that capital punishment is deeply entrenched, intractable, and necessary in the legal systems of ASEAN Member-States can soon be dispelled as fallacy.
format text
author Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V.
author_facet Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V.
author_sort Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V.
title De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
title_short De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
title_full De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
title_fullStr De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
title_full_unstemmed De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
title_sort de jure abolition of the death penalty: cambodia and the philippines
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2023
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7
_version_ 1794553734597967872