De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines
While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the histo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-1053 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.ateneo-school-of-law-pubs-10532024-03-14T07:48:00Z De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the historical contexts as well as the domestic and international factors influencing them. In addition, this chapter discusses the challenges still faced by the two countries given that even while classified as abolitionist, the situations in both Cambodia and the Philippines are not unreservedly ideal—Cambodia has not ratified the Second Optional Protocol and the Philippine government’s recent authoritarian turn has seen an intensified campaign to reimpose capital punishment through legislation. The chapter concludes by conceding that while neither can be considered model abolitionist States and despite the persistence of imperfect situations, lessons can still be learned from their experiences such as the superiority of constitutional proscriptions. Hopefully, the notion that capital punishment is deeply entrenched, intractable, and necessary in the legal systems of ASEAN Member-States can soon be dispelled as fallacy. 2023-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7 Ateneo School of Law Publications Archīum Ateneo Asian Studies Criminology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Public Policy Social and Behavioral Sciences Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Sociology |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
Asian Studies Criminology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Public Policy Social and Behavioral Sciences Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Sociology |
spellingShingle |
Asian Studies Criminology Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Public Policy Social and Behavioral Sciences Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Sociology Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
description |
While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the historical contexts as well as the domestic and international factors influencing them. In addition, this chapter discusses the challenges still faced by the two countries given that even while classified as abolitionist, the situations in both Cambodia and the Philippines are not unreservedly ideal—Cambodia has not ratified the Second Optional Protocol and the Philippine government’s recent authoritarian turn has seen an intensified campaign to reimpose capital punishment through legislation. The chapter concludes by conceding that while neither can be considered model abolitionist States and despite the persistence of imperfect situations, lessons can still be learned from their experiences such as the superiority of constitutional proscriptions. Hopefully, the notion that capital punishment is deeply entrenched, intractable, and necessary in the legal systems of ASEAN Member-States can soon be dispelled as fallacy. |
format |
text |
author |
Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. |
author_facet |
Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. |
author_sort |
Chan-Gonzaga, Ma Ngina Teresa V. |
title |
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
title_short |
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
title_full |
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
title_fullStr |
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
title_full_unstemmed |
De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines |
title_sort |
de jure abolition of the death penalty: cambodia and the philippines |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/ateneo-school-of-law-pubs/54 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7 |
_version_ |
1794553734597967872 |