The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming

The pursuit of decolonization is a first act in the manifold acts of real, because substantive, liberation of a colonized country like the Philippines. The reason is clear: every colonizer not only colonizes a country but invades and occupies the mind of the people of that country, puts a claim to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agcaoili, Aurelio S.
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol26/iss2/5
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1536/viewcontent/Budhi_2026.2_205_20Article_20__20Agcaoili.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.budhi-1536
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.budhi-15362024-11-30T08:42:03Z The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming Agcaoili, Aurelio S. The pursuit of decolonization is a first act in the manifold acts of real, because substantive, liberation of a colonized country like the Philippines. The reason is clear: every colonizer not only colonizes a country but invades and occupies the mind of the people of that country, puts a claim to their bodies, and replaces their language and cultural practices with his own to complete his violent act of “discovering” the Other. Even with independence granted to a colonized people, the intellectual residues in a colonized consciousness that has coopted with the colonizer if only to survive continue to haunt, the ghost of the exiled communal healer like the Ilokano baglan and similar other indigenous healers remaining a perennial spectral presence in the health life of a people. Unquestioned decolonization is not sufficient. There is a need to unpack its inherent contradictions to account for the “empire from within,” the hegemonic center, and the “internal colonizer.” In the surfacing of the baglan as a prototype of the androgynous healer, and thus, the androgynous tao, the person remains at the core of any act of decolonialization, or more so, post-decolonialization. Decolonialization that merely valorizes the language of the center of power and reduces those other languages of the country only results in peripheralization and erasure. A corrective paradigm, post-decolonialization, is thus a must. 2024-11-30T08:55:17Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol26/iss2/5 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1536/viewcontent/Budhi_2026.2_205_20Article_20__20Agcaoili.pdf Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture Archīum Ateneo androgyny baglan critical hermeneutics health and healing post-decolonialization
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic androgyny
baglan
critical hermeneutics
health and healing
post-decolonialization
spellingShingle androgyny
baglan
critical hermeneutics
health and healing
post-decolonialization
Agcaoili, Aurelio S.
The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
description The pursuit of decolonization is a first act in the manifold acts of real, because substantive, liberation of a colonized country like the Philippines. The reason is clear: every colonizer not only colonizes a country but invades and occupies the mind of the people of that country, puts a claim to their bodies, and replaces their language and cultural practices with his own to complete his violent act of “discovering” the Other. Even with independence granted to a colonized people, the intellectual residues in a colonized consciousness that has coopted with the colonizer if only to survive continue to haunt, the ghost of the exiled communal healer like the Ilokano baglan and similar other indigenous healers remaining a perennial spectral presence in the health life of a people. Unquestioned decolonization is not sufficient. There is a need to unpack its inherent contradictions to account for the “empire from within,” the hegemonic center, and the “internal colonizer.” In the surfacing of the baglan as a prototype of the androgynous healer, and thus, the androgynous tao, the person remains at the core of any act of decolonialization, or more so, post-decolonialization. Decolonialization that merely valorizes the language of the center of power and reduces those other languages of the country only results in peripheralization and erasure. A corrective paradigm, post-decolonialization, is thus a must.
format text
author Agcaoili, Aurelio S.
author_facet Agcaoili, Aurelio S.
author_sort Agcaoili, Aurelio S.
title The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
title_short The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
title_full The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
title_fullStr The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
title_full_unstemmed The Androgynous Baglan: Interruption, Withdrawal, and Reclaiming
title_sort androgynous baglan: interruption, withdrawal, and reclaiming
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol26/iss2/5
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1536/viewcontent/Budhi_2026.2_205_20Article_20__20Agcaoili.pdf
_version_ 1818102060184240128