Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy

Monolayer and bilayer Langmuir–Blodgett films of poly(γ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) (PBLG) were prepared on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), mica, silicon, and glass. The films were imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in the contact and tapping modes to develop imaging strategies for ultrathin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Musselman, I.H, Enriquez, Erwin P, Smith, D.L, Guarisco, Victoria F, Samulski, Edward T
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/65
https://avs.scitation.org/doi/10.1116/1.579051
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-1064
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-10642020-06-22T06:58:55Z Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy Musselman, I.H Enriquez, Erwin P Smith, D.L Guarisco, Victoria F Samulski, Edward T Monolayer and bilayer Langmuir–Blodgett films of poly(γ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) (PBLG) were prepared on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), mica, silicon, and glass. The films were imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in the contact and tapping modes to develop imaging strategies for ultrathin polypeptide films and to assess the effect of substrate on film microstructure. A better understanding of the local polypeptide film structure could guide future methods of device fabrication. The AFM tapping mode enables long‐term nondestructive imaging of PBLG mono‐ and bilayers for dimensions as small as 0.2 μm. In contrast, contact mode AFM readily damages PBLG films. PBLG has the best monolayer coverage on HOPG, although film is sometimes observed on each of the other three substrates. On HOPG, the monolayer has a predominantly ‘‘lacey’’ structure whereas for the hydrophilic substrates, mica, silicon, and glass, it is ‘‘banded’’ or ‘‘solid.’’ HOPG rarely exhibits a continuous bilayer film whereas the other three substrates exhibit much better coverage as bilayers than as monolayers. The PBLG monolayer behaves as a banded template for bilayer formation in some areas of mica, and for all four substrates, the second layer appears to be oriented with respect to the first. The morphology and coverage of PBLG as a function of substrate is discussed in terms of hydrophilicity and forces of adhesion. Whether voids observed by AFM in the PBLG structures are present in the native film at the air–water interface of the Langmuir trough, or are induced by film transfer, remains undetermined. 1994-04-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/65 https://avs.scitation.org/doi/10.1116/1.579051 Chemistry Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Chemistry Materials Chemistry
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Chemistry
Materials Chemistry
spellingShingle Chemistry
Materials Chemistry
Musselman, I.H
Enriquez, Erwin P
Smith, D.L
Guarisco, Victoria F
Samulski, Edward T
Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
description Monolayer and bilayer Langmuir–Blodgett films of poly(γ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) (PBLG) were prepared on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), mica, silicon, and glass. The films were imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in the contact and tapping modes to develop imaging strategies for ultrathin polypeptide films and to assess the effect of substrate on film microstructure. A better understanding of the local polypeptide film structure could guide future methods of device fabrication. The AFM tapping mode enables long‐term nondestructive imaging of PBLG mono‐ and bilayers for dimensions as small as 0.2 μm. In contrast, contact mode AFM readily damages PBLG films. PBLG has the best monolayer coverage on HOPG, although film is sometimes observed on each of the other three substrates. On HOPG, the monolayer has a predominantly ‘‘lacey’’ structure whereas for the hydrophilic substrates, mica, silicon, and glass, it is ‘‘banded’’ or ‘‘solid.’’ HOPG rarely exhibits a continuous bilayer film whereas the other three substrates exhibit much better coverage as bilayers than as monolayers. The PBLG monolayer behaves as a banded template for bilayer formation in some areas of mica, and for all four substrates, the second layer appears to be oriented with respect to the first. The morphology and coverage of PBLG as a function of substrate is discussed in terms of hydrophilicity and forces of adhesion. Whether voids observed by AFM in the PBLG structures are present in the native film at the air–water interface of the Langmuir trough, or are induced by film transfer, remains undetermined.
format text
author Musselman, I.H
Enriquez, Erwin P
Smith, D.L
Guarisco, Victoria F
Samulski, Edward T
author_facet Musselman, I.H
Enriquez, Erwin P
Smith, D.L
Guarisco, Victoria F
Samulski, Edward T
author_sort Musselman, I.H
title Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
title_short Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
title_full Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
title_fullStr Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
title_full_unstemmed Effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐L‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
title_sort effects of substrate on ultrathin films of poly(γ ‐benzyl‐l‐glutamate) by scanning probe microscopy
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 1994
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/65
https://avs.scitation.org/doi/10.1116/1.579051
_version_ 1681506666597580800