Surface energies of magnetic recording head components

The rate of material removal during fixed abrasive lapping is a function of friction coefficient, the surface tension of the lubricant and of the substrate, and the contact angles between the interfaces. In this study, the authors measured the surface energies of materials typically found in thin fi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abenojar, Eric C, Herber, John P, Enriquez, Erwin P
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/70
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-010-9737-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-1069
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-10692020-06-22T09:59:43Z Surface energies of magnetic recording head components Abenojar, Eric C Herber, John P Enriquez, Erwin P The rate of material removal during fixed abrasive lapping is a function of friction coefficient, the surface tension of the lubricant and of the substrate, and the contact angles between the interfaces. In this study, the authors measured the surface energies of materials typically found in thin film magnetic recording heads using contact angle measurements and the Lifshitz–van der Waals acid/base approach. The different materials tested were NixFey, Al2O3, and Al2O3-TiC. Sample preparation procedures were also considered. The chemical used to wash the surface was observed to affect the measured substrate surface energies. Surface energy values for samples washed with either acetone or hexane showed comparable results. The NixFey gave the highest measured surface energy (46.3–48.8 mJ m−2) followed by Al2O3 (44.1–45.3 mJ m−2) and Al2O3-TiC (43.3–45.3 mJ m−2). In contrast, the oil-washed samples measured generally lower surface energy values. The study characterized the interaction of two lubricant types against the three materials. The oil-based lubricant spreads completely on oil-washed samples mainly because of the low surface tension of the oil (22.0 mJ m−2) and did not show measurable contact angles. In comparison, the water-soluble lubricant ethylene glycol, due to its higher surface tension (48.0 mJ m−2), formed higher contact angles ranging from 47.2 to 59.6° on the different substrates. 2010-12-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/70 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-010-9737-7 Chemistry Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Magnetic data recording heads Boundary lubrication Surface energy Lapping Chemistry
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Magnetic data recording heads
Boundary lubrication
Surface energy
Lapping
Chemistry
spellingShingle Magnetic data recording heads
Boundary lubrication
Surface energy
Lapping
Chemistry
Abenojar, Eric C
Herber, John P
Enriquez, Erwin P
Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
description The rate of material removal during fixed abrasive lapping is a function of friction coefficient, the surface tension of the lubricant and of the substrate, and the contact angles between the interfaces. In this study, the authors measured the surface energies of materials typically found in thin film magnetic recording heads using contact angle measurements and the Lifshitz–van der Waals acid/base approach. The different materials tested were NixFey, Al2O3, and Al2O3-TiC. Sample preparation procedures were also considered. The chemical used to wash the surface was observed to affect the measured substrate surface energies. Surface energy values for samples washed with either acetone or hexane showed comparable results. The NixFey gave the highest measured surface energy (46.3–48.8 mJ m−2) followed by Al2O3 (44.1–45.3 mJ m−2) and Al2O3-TiC (43.3–45.3 mJ m−2). In contrast, the oil-washed samples measured generally lower surface energy values. The study characterized the interaction of two lubricant types against the three materials. The oil-based lubricant spreads completely on oil-washed samples mainly because of the low surface tension of the oil (22.0 mJ m−2) and did not show measurable contact angles. In comparison, the water-soluble lubricant ethylene glycol, due to its higher surface tension (48.0 mJ m−2), formed higher contact angles ranging from 47.2 to 59.6° on the different substrates.
format text
author Abenojar, Eric C
Herber, John P
Enriquez, Erwin P
author_facet Abenojar, Eric C
Herber, John P
Enriquez, Erwin P
author_sort Abenojar, Eric C
title Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
title_short Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
title_full Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
title_fullStr Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
title_full_unstemmed Surface energies of magnetic recording head components
title_sort surface energies of magnetic recording head components
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2010
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/70
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-010-9737-7
_version_ 1681506667524521984