How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil

The 2017 AHA Presidential Advisory attacked coconut oil using studies that did not involve coconut oil. A careful review of the fatty acid composition of coconut oil and animal fat shows that: first, coconut oil has a vastly different fatty acid profile from animal fats; second, coconut oil has negl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dayrit, Fabian M
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/128
https://www.icp.org.ph/2017/08/how-the-wrong-science-is-making-people-sick-the-truth-about-saturated-fat-animal-fat-and-coconut-oil/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-1127
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-11272020-07-28T08:33:07Z How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil Dayrit, Fabian M The 2017 AHA Presidential Advisory attacked coconut oil using studies that did not involve coconut oil. A careful review of the fatty acid composition of coconut oil and animal fat shows that: first, coconut oil has a vastly different fatty acid profile from animal fats; second, coconut oil has negligible cholesterol content while animal fats are high in cholesterol; and third, animal fats are actually not saturated fats. This casts doubt on the basis of the almost 60-year anti-saturated fat campaign which was focused on animal fat. Although the AHA Presidential Advisory claimed that it had new studies to present, it actually just reanalyzed old papers and selected the studies, some dating from the 1960s and 1970s, which agreed with its position and labeled these as “high quality.” It then rejected the studies which gave contrary conclusions, such as studies on HDL as a beneficial cardiovascular marker and the Minnesota Coronary Survey (MCS). The MCS study is important because it is a research project which Ancel Keys himself undertook but which failed to support his saturated fat-heart disease hypothesis. In passing judgment that coconut oil has “no known offsetting favorable effects,” the AHA has ignored evidence from thousands of years of its use in the tropics and Pacific islands that demonstrate its healthful properties, and the repeated observation that people who shifted from a coconut diet to a Western diet have gotten sick. The AHA produced no evidence that coconut oil causes heart disease. The AHA attack against coconut oil is a repeat of previous negative campaigns that have made the Americans obese and sick. 2017-08-29T07:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/128 https://www.icp.org.ph/2017/08/how-the-wrong-science-is-making-people-sick-the-truth-about-saturated-fat-animal-fat-and-coconut-oil/ Chemistry Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Biochemistry Chemistry
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Biochemistry
Chemistry
spellingShingle Biochemistry
Chemistry
Dayrit, Fabian M
How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
description The 2017 AHA Presidential Advisory attacked coconut oil using studies that did not involve coconut oil. A careful review of the fatty acid composition of coconut oil and animal fat shows that: first, coconut oil has a vastly different fatty acid profile from animal fats; second, coconut oil has negligible cholesterol content while animal fats are high in cholesterol; and third, animal fats are actually not saturated fats. This casts doubt on the basis of the almost 60-year anti-saturated fat campaign which was focused on animal fat. Although the AHA Presidential Advisory claimed that it had new studies to present, it actually just reanalyzed old papers and selected the studies, some dating from the 1960s and 1970s, which agreed with its position and labeled these as “high quality.” It then rejected the studies which gave contrary conclusions, such as studies on HDL as a beneficial cardiovascular marker and the Minnesota Coronary Survey (MCS). The MCS study is important because it is a research project which Ancel Keys himself undertook but which failed to support his saturated fat-heart disease hypothesis. In passing judgment that coconut oil has “no known offsetting favorable effects,” the AHA has ignored evidence from thousands of years of its use in the tropics and Pacific islands that demonstrate its healthful properties, and the repeated observation that people who shifted from a coconut diet to a Western diet have gotten sick. The AHA produced no evidence that coconut oil causes heart disease. The AHA attack against coconut oil is a repeat of previous negative campaigns that have made the Americans obese and sick.
format text
author Dayrit, Fabian M
author_facet Dayrit, Fabian M
author_sort Dayrit, Fabian M
title How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
title_short How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
title_full How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
title_fullStr How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
title_full_unstemmed How the Wrong Science Is Making People Sick: The Truth About Saturated Fat, Animal Fat and Coconut Oil
title_sort how the wrong science is making people sick: the truth about saturated fat, animal fat and coconut oil
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2017
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/128
https://www.icp.org.ph/2017/08/how-the-wrong-science-is-making-people-sick-the-truth-about-saturated-fat-animal-fat-and-coconut-oil/
_version_ 1681506787679797248