Challenging world leaders amid medical populism

The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement warned about medical populism, and I would like to underscore a couple of points about this framework. First, medical populism describes the style—not the content—of political actors' responses to health crisis. In Jair Bolsonaro's Brazil and Don...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lasco, Gideon
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/64
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32377-1/fulltext
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-1063
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-10632021-07-23T07:23:17Z Challenging world leaders amid medical populism Lasco, Gideon The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement warned about medical populism, and I would like to underscore a couple of points about this framework. First, medical populism describes the style—not the content—of political actors' responses to health crisis. In Jair Bolsonaro's Brazil and Donald Trump's USA, dramatic displays of defiance to public health guidelines would have resonated among libertarian constituencies, but not in Rodrigo Duterte's Philippines, where no such movement exists. It is thus unsurprising that Trump's reaction to his own illness mirrored his Brazilian counterpart's: both used their own illness to vindicate their having downplayed the pandemic. Second, if, as the medical populism framework suggests, “simplification of the pandemic” is a familiar response, then one can anticipate the further emergence of vaccines as a populist trope in the coming months. Whereas the first phase of the pandemic was marked by claims of fake cures and dramatic lockdowns, the ongoing situation involves a vaccine messianism that echoes the “culture of optimism” in previous outbreaks. In response to medical populism, the Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement recommend that leaders “prioritise advice from the professional public health community”, but, as Donald Trump illustrates, the subordinate position of public health officials makes such fiscalisation difficult. How effectively global health institutions can advise or challenge political leadership is a question that demands urgent reflection amid the sustained popularity of medical populists, regardless of their countries' successes in suppressing the pandemic. 2020-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/64 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32377-1/fulltext Development Studies Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo medical populism COVID-19 global health Development Studies Medicine and Health Sciences Public Health
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic medical populism
COVID-19
global health
Development Studies
Medicine and Health Sciences
Public Health
spellingShingle medical populism
COVID-19
global health
Development Studies
Medicine and Health Sciences
Public Health
Lasco, Gideon
Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
description The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement warned about medical populism, and I would like to underscore a couple of points about this framework. First, medical populism describes the style—not the content—of political actors' responses to health crisis. In Jair Bolsonaro's Brazil and Donald Trump's USA, dramatic displays of defiance to public health guidelines would have resonated among libertarian constituencies, but not in Rodrigo Duterte's Philippines, where no such movement exists. It is thus unsurprising that Trump's reaction to his own illness mirrored his Brazilian counterpart's: both used their own illness to vindicate their having downplayed the pandemic. Second, if, as the medical populism framework suggests, “simplification of the pandemic” is a familiar response, then one can anticipate the further emergence of vaccines as a populist trope in the coming months. Whereas the first phase of the pandemic was marked by claims of fake cures and dramatic lockdowns, the ongoing situation involves a vaccine messianism that echoes the “culture of optimism” in previous outbreaks. In response to medical populism, the Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement recommend that leaders “prioritise advice from the professional public health community”, but, as Donald Trump illustrates, the subordinate position of public health officials makes such fiscalisation difficult. How effectively global health institutions can advise or challenge political leadership is a question that demands urgent reflection amid the sustained popularity of medical populists, regardless of their countries' successes in suppressing the pandemic.
format text
author Lasco, Gideon
author_facet Lasco, Gideon
author_sort Lasco, Gideon
title Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
title_short Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
title_full Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
title_fullStr Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
title_full_unstemmed Challenging world leaders amid medical populism
title_sort challenging world leaders amid medical populism
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2020
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/64
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32377-1/fulltext
_version_ 1707059255553556480