Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines
This article examines the challenges that the right-wing populist governments in Brazil and the Philippines pose to anthropological practices as a way of discussing the responses and responsibilities of anthropologists vis-à-vis situations of growing authoritarianism across the globe. It explores th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/130 https://doi.org/10.1086/723300 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-1130 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-11302023-08-03T06:05:02Z Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines Gonçalves, João Felipe Lasco, Gideon This article examines the challenges that the right-wing populist governments in Brazil and the Philippines pose to anthropological practices as a way of discussing the responses and responsibilities of anthropologists vis-à-vis situations of growing authoritarianism across the globe. It explores the importance of public and political engagement for the national anthropologies that have developed in Brazil and the Philippines and stresses their complex relationship to recent dictatorial and democratic regimes. It discusses the threats that Jair Bolsonaro’s and Rodrigo Duterte’s governments have brought to the discipline and to the oppressed and marginalized subjects that anthropologists in those countries have typically studied and allied themselves with, as well as the reaction of anthropologists to such threats. Showing that the current Brazilian and Philippine governments combine economic and social neoliberalism with deeply illiberal political practices, the article proposes a fundamental distinction between liberal democracy and neoliberalism to argue that liberal democratic institutions and practices are fundamental conditions for the possibility of a politically engaged and publicly relevant anthropology. 2023-02-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/130 https://doi.org/10.1086/723300 Development Studies Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Brazil Philippines authoritarianism political anthropology Anthropology Other Anthropology Political Science Social and Behavioral Sciences Social and Cultural Anthropology |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
Brazil Philippines authoritarianism political anthropology Anthropology Other Anthropology Political Science Social and Behavioral Sciences Social and Cultural Anthropology |
spellingShingle |
Brazil Philippines authoritarianism political anthropology Anthropology Other Anthropology Political Science Social and Behavioral Sciences Social and Cultural Anthropology Gonçalves, João Felipe Lasco, Gideon Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
description |
This article examines the challenges that the right-wing populist governments in Brazil and the Philippines pose to anthropological practices as a way of discussing the responses and responsibilities of anthropologists vis-à-vis situations of growing authoritarianism across the globe. It explores the importance of public and political engagement for the national anthropologies that have developed in Brazil and the Philippines and stresses their complex relationship to recent dictatorial and democratic regimes. It discusses the threats that Jair Bolsonaro’s and Rodrigo Duterte’s governments have brought to the discipline and to the oppressed and marginalized subjects that anthropologists in those countries have typically studied and allied themselves with, as well as the reaction of anthropologists to such threats. Showing that the current Brazilian and Philippine governments combine economic and social neoliberalism with deeply illiberal political practices, the article proposes a fundamental distinction between liberal democracy and neoliberalism to argue that liberal democratic institutions and practices are fundamental conditions for the possibility of a politically engaged and publicly relevant anthropology. |
format |
text |
author |
Gonçalves, João Felipe Lasco, Gideon |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, João Felipe Lasco, Gideon |
author_sort |
Gonçalves, João Felipe |
title |
Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
title_short |
Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
title_full |
Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
title_fullStr |
Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anthropology, Democracy, and Authoritarianism: Reflections from Brazil and the Philippines |
title_sort |
anthropology, democracy, and authoritarianism: reflections from brazil and the philippines |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/130 https://doi.org/10.1086/723300 |
_version_ |
1773556602948812800 |